JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[JJ] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気水圏科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG51] [JJ] 沿岸海洋生態系──1.水循環と陸海相互作用

2017年5月24日(水) 10:45 〜 12:15 301A (国際会議場 3F)

コンビーナ:小路 淳(広島大学大学院生物圏科学研究科)、杉本 亮(福井県立大学海洋生物資源学部)、山田 誠(総合地球環境学研究所)、藤井 賢彦(北海道大学大学院地球環境科学研究院)、座長:小路 淳(広島大学大学院生物圏科学研究科)、座長:杉本 亮(福井県立大学海洋生物資源学部)、座長:山田 誠(総合地球環境学研究所)、座長:藤井 賢彦(北海道大学大学院地球環境科学研究院)

10:45 〜 11:00

[ACG51-06] 福井県小浜湾における海底湧水由来の熱フラックスの推定

*山田 誠1杉本 亮2本田 尚美1 (1.総合地球環境学研究所、2.福井県立大学)

キーワード:海底湧水、熱フラックス、沿岸域

Various studies regarding submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) have been performed. Although SGD has been recognized as an important pathway for nutrients transport from land to coastal ocean, SGD also supplies other chemical compositions as well as heat in the form of thermal energy. Especially, there is a difference in water temperatures of SGD and seawater, since groundwater temperature is almost constant throughout the year and seawater temperature varies. However, it is not clear that how much heat energy is supplied by SGD and its associated impacts on coastal ecosystems. Several studies assessing the impact of drainage water from the power plants have indicated that the water temperature has a significant impact on the coastal ecosystems. It highlights the need for assessing the impact of SGD on coastal ecosystems not only by considering the nutrient influx but also by giving equal importance to inflow water temperatures. To investigate this hypothesis, we undertook a study in a coastal area of Obama Bay, Fukui Prefecture, Japan.
In Obama Bay, SGD rate has been estimated using 222Rn and salinity mass balance model (Sugimoto et al., 2016). We calculated the heat quantity from SGD by using the formula [E = Q * Cp * ΔT], where, E is the heat quantity from SGD; Q is the SGD rate from Sugimoto et al. (2016); Cp is the specific heat at constant pressure; and ΔT is the difference between seawater and groundwater temperatures. The following results are obtained from this study: The SGD resulted in hot and cold heat influx to the coastal areas during winter and summer seasons, respectively. Although SGD rate is observed much less than the river discharge, cold heat flux from SGD was greater than the river during summer. SGD resulted in lowering the sea water temperature at the bay during the summer. In this presentation, we will additionally discuss about the magnitude of this heat-flux as compared to the results of SGD heat-flux at another study site.