JET2019

講演情報

Presentation Awards

[L1-8] Presentation Awards
Heat-11 Clinical trials-2

2019年2月23日(土) 13:20 〜 14:50 HallL-1 (Nexus)

Moderator: Chung-Ho Hsu(China Medical University Hospital),Takafumi Ueno(久留米大学病院)
Panelist: Hiroki Higami(Otsu Red CrossHospital),Hiroki Takahashi(山形大学医学部附属病院)

[MO-70] Presentation Awards

Further risk stratification by systemic factors in WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system) Stage 4 but not in Stage 1-3 in chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Yosuke Hata

Background: The latest guidelines emphasize the importance of assessing limb characteristics, including the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification for predicting limb prognosis in critical limb-threatening ischemia (CTLI). On the other hand, previous reports suggested that some systemic factors were associated with the limb prognosis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to reveal the prognostic impact of patient characteristics on limb prognosis in CTLI undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT).

Methods: We analyzed 735 CTLI patients (age 73.9±9.8 years, male 61.2%, diabetes 66.8%, hemodialysis 54.1%) who underwent the initial EVT between April 2010 and December 2015. The limb severity at baseline was assessed by the WIfI classification. The predictors of wound healing in WIfI stage 1-3 and 4 were explored by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results: The 1-year wound healing rate was 60% in WIfI stage 1-3 and 54% in WIfI stage 4 patients, respectively (P=0.011). In WIfI stage 1-3, no systemic factors were significantly associated with delayed wound healing, whereas in WIfI stage 4, the following three factors were identified as independent risk factors for delayed wound healing: (1) non-ambulatory status (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49 [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.34-0.71], P<0.001), (2) hemodialysis (HR 0.56 [0.38-0.83], P=0.004) and (3) hypoalbuminemia under 3.0 g/dl (HR 0.63 [0.42-0.96], P=0.032). In figure, the 1-year wound healing rate in WIfI stage 4 with ≤1 of the three risk factors was 68%, which was significantly higher than that in WIfI stage 4 with ≥2 risk factor (36%, p<0.001), and comparable to that in WIfI stage 1-3 (60%, p> 0.05).

Conclusions: Non-ambulatory status, hemodialysis and hypoalbuminemia were additional risk factors for delayed wound healing in WIfI stage 4. Freedom from accumulation of these risk factors in WIfI stage 4 was comparable in wound healing to WIfI stage 1-3.