日本地球惑星科学連合2014年大会

講演情報

口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-IS ジョイント

[M-IS25_28AM2] 遠洋域の進化

2014年4月28日(月) 11:00 〜 12:45 411 (4F)

コンビーナ:*松岡 篤(新潟大学理学部地質科学科)、栗原 敏之(新潟大学大学院自然科学研究科)、加藤 泰浩(東京大学大学院工学系研究科システム創成学専攻)、尾上 哲治(鹿児島大学理学部地球環境科学科)、木元 克典(独立行政法人海洋研究開発機構)、野崎 達生(海洋研究開発機構地球内部ダイナミクス領域)、植田 勇人(弘前大学教育学部)、小林 健太(新潟大学理学部地質科学科)、長谷川 卓(金沢大学自然システム学系)、座長:松岡 篤(新潟大学理学部地質科学科)

11:15 〜 11:30

[MIS25-08] 形態的非類似度と形態的豊富度の比較

*生形 貴男1 (1.静岡大学)

キーワード:異質性, 多様性, 形態的非類似度, 形態的豊富度

Morphological disparity, another look at biodiversity, has recently attracted attention of paleontologists in the context of mass extinction and recovery. The measure of disparity has commonly been based on morphological dissimilarity between objects, e.g., sum of variance, mean pairwise distance, range of variation etc. It is widely known that this sort of disparity is robust against sample size and is not seriously affected by a nonselective extinction, whereas selective extinctions should readily reduce the disparity. On the other hand, another aspect of disparity is morphological richness, which is assessed through compilations of the number of character states; e.g., number of pairwise character-state combinations and number of morphospace divisions occupied by observation. Unlike the morphological dissimilarity, the morphological richness appears to be fairly sensitive to nonselective extinctions as well as to selective ones. The comparison among the diversity measures based on the morphometric data obtained from the ammonoids revealed that the patterns of disparity change were totally different between dissimilarity and richness, while comparison within the same categories tended to indicate a consistent result. This result suggests that comparison between morphological dissimilarity and morphological richness provides a powerful tool to assess the selectivity of an extinction event.