日本地球惑星科学連合2019年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-IS ジョイント

[M-IS14] 南大洋・南極氷床が駆動する全球気候変動

2019年5月27日(月) 10:45 〜 12:15 コンベンションホールB (2F)

コンビーナ:関 宰(北海道大学低温科学研究所)、岡 顕(東京大学大気海洋研究所)、植村 立(琉球大学 理学部)、真壁 竜介(国立極地研究所)、座長:シェリフ多田野 サム(東京大学)

11:00 〜 11:15

[MIS14-07] GIAモデルによる東南極の測地観測に対する地球内部粘性構造と完新世南極氷床変動の影響評価

*奥野 淳一1,2土井 浩一郎1,2青山 雄一1,2石輪 健樹1服部 晃久2福田 洋一3 (1.国立極地研究所、2.総合研究大学院大学、3.京都大学)

キーワード:GIA、東南極、GNSS、重力変化

Geodetic and geomorphological observations in the coastal part of Antarctica indicate the uplift trend associated with the removal mass of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) in the last deglaciation. The numerical calculations of crustal motion derived from the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) modeling have played the role of inferring the ice mass change of AIS from observations related to solid Earth deformation. The deglaciation histories of the AIS inferred from the comparisons between the geomorphological sea-level records, and GIA modeling shows the monotonic Holocene retreat for the AIS (e.g., Whitehouse et al., 2012). However, GNSS observations in some regions in the coastal part of Antarctica cannot be explained the amplitudes of the uplift by only glacial rebound due to the last deglaciation of the AIS. Also, recent studies (e.g., Kingslake et al., 2018) concerning bedrock topography in the margin of AIS inferred that some portions of the ice sheet might have re-advanced after retreating behind the present-day margin in mid-to-late Holocene. Therefore, this re-advance of AIS in Holocene may be caused to arise the mismatch between GNSS observations and numerical predictions. On the other hand, GNSS observations include not only the components of the GIA due to the last deglaciation and also elastic deformation due to present-day surface mass balance (e.g., Hattori et al., 2018). Similarly, this effect could cause a difference between the GNSS observations and the GIA calculations. In this presentation, we will show the crustal deformation rates and gravity changes calculated by the GIA modeling using the previously published deglaciation histories and the comparisons with these observations obtained from East Antarctica. We intend to discuss the influences of AIS mass changes and choice of mantle viscosity profile on the geodetic measurements in East Antarctica.