日本地球惑星科学連合2019年大会

講演情報

[J] ポスター発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-SS 地震学

[S-SS13] 強震動・地震災害

2019年5月27日(月) 15:30 〜 17:00 ポスター会場 (幕張メッセ国際展示場 8ホール)

コンビーナ:栗山 雅之(一般財団法人 電力中央研究所 地球工学研究所 地震工学領域)、染井 一寛(一般財団法人地域地盤環境研究所)

[SSS13-P26] 微動アレイ探査における水平動成分を利用した位相速度推定手法によるラブ波抽出の可能性についてー愛知県西尾市の場合

*土田 琴世1堀家 正則1山田 浩二1末廣 匡基1吉田 沙由美1 (1.株式会社阪神コンサルタンツ)

キーワード:微動アレイ探査、ラブ波、水平動成分

1) Introduction

The S wave velocity structure of sediments is the most important factor for amplification of earthquake motions. In recent years, microtremor array surveys have been popularized because the S wave velocity structures can be estimated by simple measurements and at a low cost. For example, Horike (1985) inferred the S wave velocity from f-k spectra estimated array microtremors and Aki (1957) and Okada (2003) also inferred them from the spatial autocorrelation functions (SPAC). These approaches use vertical microtremor array recordings and discard horizontal-component recordings. As is well known, the phase velocity of Rayleigh waves is influenced not only by the S-wave velocity structure but also by the P-wave velocity structure, while that of Love wave is influenced by the S-wave velocity structure alone. Therefore, it is expected that S wave velocity structure can be obtained clearly by estimating the velocity structure using the dispersion of the Love wave. Several approaches are developed for inference of the phase velocity of Love waves, for example f-k method by Tsuchida et al (2016), SPAC and CCA method by Tada et al (2010; using the microtremor array analysis tool "BIDO 2.0" software). The aim of this study is to compare the phase velocities obtained using the same arrays.

2) Observation and data

For this comparison, we implemented microtremor measurement in Nishio City, Aichi Prefecture, using different-size array composed of 7 stations. At each station 3-component velocity sensors were installed. Microtremor recording were acquired at a sampling interval of 0.005s for 30 minutes. This site is suitable for this comparison, because there is much information about geotechnical and geological property.

3) Results

At the present, the phase velocity by the f-k method is estimated, but it is still in the process of analysis. Therefore, by the day of the presentation, we will proceed with the remains to do.