日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-GI 地球科学一般・情報地球科学

[M-GI30] Near Surface Investigation and Modeling for Groundwater Resources Assessment and Conservation

2021年6月4日(金) 15:30 〜 17:00 Ch.12 (Zoom会場12)

コンビーナ:Jui-Pin Tsai(National Taiwan University, Taiwan)、谷口 真人(総合地球環境学研究所)、Ping-Yu Chang(National Central University)、座長:Jui-Pin Tsai(National Taiwan University, Taiwan)、Shao-Yiu Hsu(National Taiwan University)

15:45 〜 16:00

[MGI30-02] Applicability of Dupuit-Ghijben-Herzberg (DGH) analysis to quantifying the volume of freshwater lenses in extremely permeable aquifers

*田嶋 智1、劉 佳奇1、徳永 朋祥1 (1.東京大学)


キーワード:淡水レンズ、塩水侵入、サンゴ島、石灰岩、数値シミュレーション、FEFLOW

Freshwater lenses are vulnerable water resources in small, low-lying coral islands. An analytical model based on the Dupuit-Ghijben-Herzberg approximation (DGH analysis) delineates the geometry of freshwater lenses simply and effectively, and hence, it has been widely used for practical purposes. DGH analysis assumes a steady-state and ignores vertical groundwater flow and dispersion processes. When the hydraulic conductivity (K) of an aquifer is extremely high, these simplifications may not work properly. Few studies, however, have investigated the freshwater lenses formed in extremely permeable aquifers in detail, and the applicability of DGH analysis remains unclear. This research aims to clarify whether DGH analysis is applicable to quantifying freshwater volume in an aquifer having an extremely high K. A case study in Tarama Island, Japan, was performed by comparing DGH analyses, numerical simulations, and in-situ salinity measurements. It was found that when K was 1.1×10-3 m s-1 or higher, the freshwater volumes estimated by the DGH analyses were larger than those by the numerical simulations, and this discrepancy increased with the increase of K. In particular, when K was 2.0×10-2 m s-1, which is the estimated value for the aquifer in the Tarama Island, the freshwater volume estimated by the DGH analyses was around 14 times larger than that by the numerical simulation. It should be noted that the in-situ measurements were much closer to the numerical simulations compared with the DGH analyses. Moreover, the numerical simulations showed that saline pore water exists in the unsaturated zone near the coastline. The large discrepancy between the DGH analyses and the numerical simulations may be attributed to the fact that DGH analysis ignores the dispersion processes. Therefore, DGH analysis should be applied with caution to assessing freshwater lenses in extremely permeable aquifers.