日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-CG 固体地球科学複合領域・一般

[S-CG45] 海洋底地球科学

2021年6月5日(土) 13:45 〜 15:15 Ch.19 (Zoom会場19)

コンビーナ:沖野 郷子(東京大学大気海洋研究所)、座長:木戸 元之(東北大学 災害科学国際研究所)、富田 史章(国立研究開発法人 海洋研究開発機構)

13:45 〜 14:00

[SCG45-13] 鬼界海底カルデラ付近で得られた海底圧力観測の初期的な結果

浅井 ゆう子1、*島 伸和1,2、羽入 朋子2、松野 哲男2,1、廣瀬 仁3,1、南 拓人1、杉岡 裕子2,1 (1.神戸大学大学院理学研究科惑星学専攻、2.神戸大学海洋底探査センター、3.神戸大学都市安全研究センター)

キーワード:海底圧力変化、海洋潮汐、地殻への荷重効果

We perform tidal analysis of ocean bottom pressure variation, which were measured by 4 ‘OBEMP (Ocean Bottom Electro-Magnetometer with absolute Pressure gauge)’ instruments at observation sites around Kikai submarine caldera, SW Japan. These measurements were made during periods of April/2018-Oct./2018, Nov./2018-Sept./2019, Nov./2018-March/2019, and Nov./2019-March/2020, with their water depths of 392m, 312m, 206m, and 196m, respectively. Tidal analysis of these data is performed using BAYTAP-G program (Tamura et al., 1991) to derive tidal amplitudes, factors, and phases of 14 diurnal and semidiurnal tidal groups, and these data are decomposed into three parts: 1) a tidal part, 2) a part that is correlated with the ocean bottom temperature measurement data, and 3) a nontidal part. The tidal factors are estimated at ~2 and ~ 3.5 for diurnal and semidiurnal tidal groups, respectively. Some tidal factors and phases that are well estimated with small errors indicate slight difference among the observation sites. Comparison of tidal factors and phases between our results and a global ocean tide model, NAO.99b (Matsumoto et al., 2000), also shows slight differences. These differences could be due to local loading effect on crust with relation to the existence of Kikai submarine caldera. We will perform further analysis with respect to site location difference, period dependence, and time variation to investigate possible local loading effect on crust. The result from the nontidal part indicates two characteristic features. One is a sudden increase of pressure values (~30 hPa) with in 6 hours, which occurred on August 22, 2018 at one observation site. We will investigate possible causes of the sudden pressure increase. The second one is pressure variation of 20 hPa with its period longer than a week. This variation was observed at two observation sites during Nov./2018-March/2019, which was the only duration that we made simultaneous observation at two observation sites. The similar pressure variations at two sites that are separated by 45 km in distance suggest that these variations are due to a same cause. Since pressure variation at ocean bottom corresponds to the sum of air pressure and pressure due to total mass of ocean water above observation site, we compare our pressure variation with air pressure variations observed at three Japan Meteorological Agency observation sites (Makurasaki, Tanegashima, and Yakushima) far around Kikai submarine caldera, whose data were provided by Japan Meteorological Agency. The overall air pressure variations at three sites are the same with a very small difference within ~2 hPa, suggesting air pressure variations at our ocean bottom observation sites would be the same. The comparison indicates no correlation for the period longer than a week, suggesting two things. The air pressure variations are well compensated by change in total mass of ocean water (change in ocean height level), and leads no effective variation on pressure at ocean bottom. Thus, the pressure variation of 20 hPa with its period longer than a week should be due to pressure due to total mass of ocean water above two observation sites that is probably caused by ocean current variation. We will analyze period dependence of correlation between ocean bottom pressure variations and air pressure variations. We will present all these results and possible implications from them.