日本地球惑星科学連合2022年大会

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-AG 応用地球科学

[M-AG37] CTBT IMS Technologies for Detecting Nuclear Explosion and Their Applications to Earth Science

2022年5月31日(火) 11:00 〜 13:00 オンラインポスターZoom会場 (32) (Ch.32)

コンビーナ:Ozel Nurcan Meral(Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization)、コンビーナ:松本 浩幸(国立研究開発法人海洋研究開発機構)、コンビーナ:Metz Dirk(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)、コンビーナ:直井 洋介(国立研究開発法人日本原子力研究開発機構)、座長:松本 浩幸(国立研究開発法人海洋研究開発機構)

11:00 〜 13:00

[MAG37-P02] Interpretations of hydrodynamic pressure observations during an earthquake

*松本 浩幸1梶川 宏明2有吉 慶介1高橋 成実1,3荒木 英一郎1 (1.国立研究開発法人海洋研究開発機構、2.国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所、3.国立研究開発法人防災科学技術研究所)

The series of hydrodynamic pressure dataset recorded by the experiment and the in-situ observation at the seafloor during the far-field earthquake are examined. A large earthquake (Mw7.8) occurred off the Aleutian Islands while hydrostatic pressure produced by the dead-weight tester was applied to some different typed pressure transducers; one is the quartz resonant pressure transducer and the other is silicon resonant pressure transducer. All pressure transducers were set into the 2-degreeC oil chamber and pressurized with 20 MPa, by which the pressure transducers could be regarded as they were at approximately 2000 meter water depth. Ambient ground motion was also monitored by a broadband seismometer during the present experiment. The initial seismic wave associated with the Aleutian Islands earthquake was recorded by the broadband seismometer at 9 min after the earthquake, followed by the Rayleigh wave which was predominant at the laboratory. It is worthwhile noting that hydrodynamic pressure fluctuations were identified for all pressurized transducers, which was attributable to vertical movement of the deadweight. Comparing the experimental recording with the in-situ observation by the DONET pressure sensor deployed at 2000 meter, pressure amplitudes are fairly coincident each other at a frequency range around 0.04 Hz. Experimental observation is larger than the in-situ observation at a low frequency range below 0.02 Hz, which may be attributed to the ambient pressure change. Our experiment suggests that the silicon resonant pressure transducer shows less sensitivity than the quartz resonant pressure transducer at a high frequency range over 0.1 Hz.