Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2023

Presentation information

[E] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-IT Science of the Earth's Interior & Techtonophysics

[S-IT16] Deep Earth Sciences

Thu. May 25, 2023 3:30 PM - 4:45 PM 302 (International Conference Hall, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Jun Tsuchiya(Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University), Kenji Ohta(Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology), Kenji Kawai(Department of Earth and Planetary Science, School of Science, University of Tokyo), Tsuyoshi Iizuka(University of Tokyo), Chairperson:Kenji Kawai(Department of Earth and Planetary Science, School of Science, University of Tokyo), Tsuyoshi Iizuka(University of Tokyo)

4:30 PM - 4:45 PM

[SIT16-16] Ediacaran collapse and Cambrian recovery of the dynamo: implications for inner core growth and the rise of animal life

*John Anthony Tarduno1, Tinghong Zhou1 (1.Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA)

The discovery of an ultra-weak geomagnetic field, some 10x weaker than the present-day, at ca. 565 Ma during the Ediacaran Period by Bono et al. (Nature Geoscience, 2019), together with the recent documentation of a renewal of high field intensity during the early Cambrian (Zhou et al., Nature Communications, 2022), shows the two predicted signatures for the onset of inner core growth. The weak field is predicted because over billions of years thermal power for the geodynamo wanes; in the Ediacaran Period the field appears to be close to collapse. The weak field is accompanied by highly unusual magnetic directions and a hyper-reversal frequency. Some of these phenomena have been interpreted as instability of the entire solid Earth relative to the spin axis (true polar wander). Instead, these are best interpreted as manifestations of an unstable dynamo in a rotationally stable Earth, implying that true polar wander was not the main driver of late Proterozoic glaciations. The inherent protection of early animal life by the atmosphere and water implies that any direct connection between increased energetic particle flux during the ultra-weak field period and radiation or extinction events is unlikely. However, indirect effects including atmospheric change are possible. Moreover, the rapid recovery of field strength in the Cambrian, expected as new energy sources to power the geodynamo become available from inner core growth, provided critical magnetic shielding of the atmosphere just as it was becoming more vulnerable to loss from erosion by the solar wind.