Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2024

Presentation information

[E] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-EM Earth's Electromagnetism

[S-EM12] Electric, magnetic and electromagnetic survey technologies and scientific achievements

Sun. May 26, 2024 9:00 AM - 10:15 AM 304 (International Conference Hall, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Tada-nori Goto(Graduate School of Science, University of Hyogo), Yoshiya Usui(Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo), Yuguo Li(Ocean University of China), Wiebke Heise(GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand), Chairperson:Kiyoshi Fuji-ta(GSE,Osaka University), Takeshi Suzuki(Institute for Geothermal Sciences, Kyoto University)

9:30 AM - 9:45 AM

[SEM12-03] Electrical conductivities of Kanto region estimated from P-wave velocity data

*Ikuko Fujii1, Masaomi Tsukaguchi2 (1.Meteorological College, Japan Meteorological Agency, 2.Kagoshima Meteorological Observatory)

Keywords:conductivity, P wave velocity, porosity

Information of a conductivity distribution of Kanto region is limited because of severe urban noise. However, there is a demand for it in order to estimate Geomagnetically Induced Currents there precisely.

In this study, we attempt to estimate a conductivity distribution of the region. For the upper crust and a part of the lower crust, data sets of the seismic P-wave velocity distribution in Kanto region were converted to a conductivity distribution. The conductivity and the P-wave velocity are both related to the porosity, therefore, it is theoretically possible that the conductivity can be estimated from the P-wave velocity via the porosity, However, the relationship between the conductivity and the P-wave velocity depends on conditions of rocks and several conversion formulae are proposed. We tested several formulae based on Corcione et al. (2007). In addition, we found that the temperature can play a role to estimate the conductivity of the upper crust. The temperature dependency of rock properties were read from a laboratory measurement by Yokoyama (1983).

Forward modeling of the geoelectric field in Kanto region was conducted by using the estimated conductivity distribution. A comparison between observed and computed geoelectric fields at Kakioka suggests that an larger amplitude of the eastward component of the geoelectric field at Kakioka might not be reproduced by a complicated conductivity distribution around Kakioka.