JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EE] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-HW 水文・陸水・地下水学・水環境

[A-HW32] [EE] Biodiversity, nutrients and other materials in ecosystems from headwaters to coasts

2017年5月21日(日) 09:00 〜 10:30 201B (国際会議場 2F)

コンビーナ:奥田 昇(総合地球環境学研究所)、小野寺 真一(広島大学大学院総合科学研究科)、池谷 透(総合地球環境学研究所)、Adina Paytan(University of California Santa Cruz)、座長:Paytan Adina(University of California, Santa Cruz)

10:00 〜 10:15

[AHW32-11] Comparisons of oxygen isotope ratio of phosphate in river water and rocks between two watersheds in central Japan

*井手 淳一郎1Cid-Andres Abigail2石田 卓也3尾坂 兼一4岩田 智也5林 拓矢5明石 真徳5陀安 一郎3奥田 昇3 (1.九州大学持続可能な社会のための決断科学センター、2.大阪大学、3.総合地球環境学研究所、4.滋賀県立大学 環境科学部 環境生態学科、5.山梨大学 工学部 循環システム工学科)

キーワード:Stable isotope analysis, Source of phosphate, Diffuse pollution, Lake Biwa, Accretionary complex

Excess phosphorus (P) utilization by human activities has resulted in a large amount of P loss from terrestrial to aquatic ecosystems, which in turn can induce eutrophication and subsequently algal bloom in enclosed waters. To control the P loss, the phosphate oxygen isotope ratio (δ18OP) technique is expected to be applied for clarifying P dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems. This is because δ18OP in river water could reflect sources of phosphate within the river watershed. However, very few studies have applied the δ18OP technique to clarifying watershed-scale P dynamics and thus little information is available about what the river δ18OP value indicates specifically within the watershed. To examine this, we compared the δ18OP values in river water and rocks between two watersheds with different land-use and geological compositions. For this, we collected river water and rock samples and analyzed their δ18OP in subwatersheds of the Ado River and the Yasu River watersheds, which were dominated by forests and covered by large areas of agricultural lands, respectively, belonging to the Yodo River system in central Japan. The river δ18OP value was significantly higher in the Ado River watershed than in the Yasu River watershed (u-test, p < 0.05). This could not be explained by the forest area ratio within a subwatershed. The relationship between river δ18OP values and subwatershed areas revealed that the δ18OP value tended to increase and reach a plateau as the subwatershed area increased. Additionally, the result showed that the river δ18OP value was higher in the Ado River watershed than in the Yasu River watershed at a given subwatershed area. These findings are attributable to the fact that high values of δ18OP in river water could derive from those in the accretionary complex. This is because geological compositions in the subwatershed with large area (≥ 10 km2) contain the accretionary complex in the Yasu River watershed and also because geology in the Ado River watershed is composed mostly of the accretionary complex. On the other hand, the river δ18OP value could change not only by the geological factor, but also by biologic uptake of phosphate. It is possible that changes in the river δ18OP value with the subwatershed area resulted partly from an increase in the opportunity for the biologically-mediate oxygen isotope exchange between water and phosphate associated with the increased river length.