IAG-IASPEI 2017

Presentation information

Poster

IAG Symposia » G05. Multi-signal positioning: Theory and applications

[G05-P] Poster

Thu. Aug 3, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Shinsho Hall (The KOBE Chamber of Commerce and Industry, 3F)

3:30 PM - 4:30 PM

[G05-P-01] Assessment of GNSS and map integration for lane-level applications in the scope of Intelligent Transportation Location Based Services (ITLBS)

Emerson Cavalheri, Marcelo Santos (University of New Brunswick)

To enable safe and robust Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) applications, the integration of different sensors and techniques will certainly be a common reality. One application in this context is the lane-keeping techniques for autonomous driving systems. These systems normally use imagery sensors for lane identification, however imagery systems always depend on light and well structured roads. One potential worldwide autonomous driving technique without any other lane and road detection/identification sensor would be GNSS positions along with accurate map information. However, this fusion depends on the accuracy and reliability of both GNSS positions and map information. The positioning accuracy that Intelligent Transportation Location Based Services (ITLBS) requires for where-in-lane and active control applications are 0.5 m and 0.1 m, respectively. To evaluate the potential of a such fusion, this work proposes an integration of GNSS and map information in the attempt to address the lane-keeping problem. This integration is performed by merging GNSS solutions and lane centerline positions, acquired from aerial orthophotos, into a Kalman Filter and a map-matching approach. To measure the positioning error, or off-track performance, a conversion of positions to the “road domain" is necessary. To evaluate the results, a positioning accuracy limit, considering the road, vehicle dimensions, and the requirements for ITLBS is also proposed. The results showed that 95% of the time the proposed methodology off-track performances were within 1.89 m, in an average of 4 runs. Half of the runs were within 0.75 m, in average, at 95% of the time. Compared to an accurate GNSS Post Processed Kinematic (PPK) mode, an improvement of 10% was achieved.