Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2014

Presentation information

Poster

Symbol A (Atmospheric, Ocean, and Environmental Sciences) » A-AS Atmospheric Sciences, Meteorology & Atmospheric Environment

[A-AS22_1PO1] Atmospheric Chemistry

Thu. May 1, 2014 6:15 PM - 7:30 PM Poster (3F)

Convener:*Takegawa Nobuyuki(Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo), Yousuke Sawa(Geochemical Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute), Yugo Kanaya Yugo(Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Kenshi Takahashi(Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University), Hiroshi Tanimoto(National Institute for Environmental Studies)

6:15 PM - 7:30 PM

[AAS22-P27] Observations of horizontal distributions of air pollutants by MAX-DOAS

*Wentao NI1, Hitoshi IRIE1, Cheng CHEN1, Tamio TAKAMURA1, Pradeep KHATRI1 (1.Chiba University)

Keywords:MAX-DOAS, Elevation angle offset, vertical profile, tropospheric column amount, differential slant column density

In June 2012 we set up a MAX-DOAS device in Chiba University and continuous observations have been conducted since then. The MAX-DOAS method measures the spectra of scattered sunlight in ultraviolet and visible regions at various elevation angles. By analyzing the measured spectra with a radiative transfer model and an inversion method, vertical distributions of aerosol and gas and their column amounts can be retrieved (Irie et al., 2008,2009, Vlemmix, 2010). In this study, firstly, we compared the aerosol optical depth measured by the MAX-DOAS to that measured by the sky radiometer. We found the consistency of differences between MAX-DOAS and sky radiometer AOD values are within 30%.Secondly, we set up two MAX-DOAS devices (machine No.1 and No.2) for simultaneous observations at the same place. For both devices, the wavelength regions of 460-490nm and338-370nm were analyzed with the DOAS method to derive the differential slant column densities (DSCDs) of O4.In order to quantify the effect of the systematic offset of the elevation angle in O4 DSCDs, we have biased the offset of elevation angles by +-0.5,+-1.0 degrees. Comparisons such as correlation analysis etc. show that the effect is insignificant as there is only 20% differences found in the O4 DSCD comparisons between two devices. Based on such a detailed error evaluation, since December 2013, we have directed the machine No.1 to north and No.2 to west to perform quantitative observations of horizontal-distribution of aerosols. Results will be discussed in this work.