日本地球惑星科学連合2014年大会

講演情報

インターナショナルセッション(口頭発表)

セッション記号 A (大気海洋・環境科学) » A-HW 水文・陸水・地下水学・水環境

[A-HW07_29AM1] Insight into change and evolution in hydrology

2014年4月29日(火) 09:00 〜 10:45 511 (5F)

コンビーナ:*谷 誠(京都大学大学院農学研究科地域環境科学専攻)、松四 雄騎(京都大学防災研究所 地盤災害研究部門 山地災害環境分野)、野口 正二(森林総合研究所)、中北 英一(京都大学防災研究所)、座長:野口 正二(森林総合研究所)、谷 誠(京都大学大学院農学研究科地域環境科学専攻)

09:15 〜 09:30

[AHW07-02] 九州地方の人工林小流域における蒸発散と水利用効率について

*清水 貴範1玉井 幸治1熊谷 朝臣2石塚 成宏3大谷 義一1清水 晃3 (1.森林総合研究所、2.名古屋大学地球水循環研究センター、3.森林総合研究所九州支所)

キーワード:Planted coniferous forest stand, Growth difference, Water vapor flux, Carbon dioxide flux, Water use efficiency

Japanese cedar (Cryptmeria japonica D. Don) and Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) are the most popular planted species in Japan. These species cover about 20% of the land surface of the country. On a mountainous topography which is common in Japan, Japanese cedar was usually planted from valleys to lower hillsides with relatively wet and fertile soils, while Japanese cypress was planted on the drier and more nutrient poor ridge areas. Accordingly, evapotranspiration (ET) and carbon assimilation may be variable in the two species. We applied multiple methods to estimate ET from a planted forest watershed located in Kyushu Island, south western part of Japan. The watershed existed on mountainous terrain, and the right bank was mainly covered with well-grown Japanese cedar while the larger part of the left bank was covered with relatively less-grown Japanese cypress. We applied the eddy covariance method, using an observation tower built in the center of the watershed. The eddy covariance data were experimentally divided to two sectors by wind direction, right bank side and left bank side of the watershed, and the lack of data for each wind sector were interpolated by the mutual imputation method. The analysis period in this study is 2007-2008. Within the period, the rainfall interception loss (Ic) and sap-flux density were also measured in Japanese cedar plots, and the lower canopy ET was estimated by a model. From the eddy covariance result, ET from the left bank side was estimated as 85% of that from the right bank side in the period. Compared the right bank side ET with the combination of Ic, upper- and lower-canopy ET, the difference in annual total ET was about 1% when global solar radiation (Sd) was greater than 0, which assured the accuracy of the eddy covariance method even over the complex terrain.As for carbon assimilation, we simultaneously measured CO2 flux and CO2 concentration profile by using the observation tower. Based on the measurements, we can estimate the CO2 exchange between the forest and atmosphere through the similar procedure to ET. Thus in this study, we will estimate the carbon budged and calculate the water use efficiency of the whole ecosystem of the watershed and of the both bank sides. From the tentative result obtained at present, the average NEE of the left bank side was 87% to that of the right bank side, in the daytime (Sd > 0) in 2007-2008. From the value and the aforementioned ET ratio (0.85), the water use efficiency of the both bank sides were might be almost the same as each other. In the presentation, we will discuss about the detail, considering the respired CO2 in the nighttime and the rainfall interception in the Japanese cypress plot.