日本地球惑星科学連合2014年大会

講演情報

口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気海洋・環境科学) » A-HW 水文・陸水・地下水学・水環境

[A-HW28_30AM2] 流域の水及び物質の輸送と循環-源流域から沿岸域まで-

2014年4月30日(水) 11:00 〜 12:45 314 (3F)

コンビーナ:*知北 和久(北海道大学大学院理学研究院自然史科学部門)、入野 智久(北海道大学 大学院地球環境科学研究院)、小野寺 真一(広島大学大学院総合科学研究科)、中屋 眞司(信州大学工学部土木工学科)、小林 政広(独立行政法人森林総合研究所)、齋藤 光代(岡山大学大学院環境生命科学研究科)、吉川 省子(農業環境技術研究所)、奥田 昇(京都大学生態学研究センター)、座長:中屋 眞司(信州大学工学部土木工学科)

12:00 〜 12:15

[AHW28-12] 北海道沙流川懸濁物の鉱物組成と運搬量の2003年前後の変化

*入野 智久1中田 聡史2池原 研3山下 洋平1関 宰1長尾 誠也4 (1.北海道大学、2.京都大学、3.産業技術総合研究所地質情報研究部門、4.金沢大学)

キーワード:河川懸濁物, 沙流川, 2003年台風10号, 鉱物組成

Supply of detrital material from river can affect the continuity, sedimentation rate, and composition of marine sediments deposited in front of the river system, which is controlled by the relief, weathering rate, and precipitation of the hinterland. In spite of the small drainage area, the small rapid rivers in the island arc located under warm humid climatic condition supply a huge amount of detrital materials to the surrounding seas. In addition, sediment transports tend to be concentrated during flooding events. In order to understand the depositional history and utilized it for paleo-climate reconstruction, it is necessary to study a mechanism of suspension generation and controlling factor of its composition.We conducted a field survey during 2005-2011 in the Hidaka area in Hokkaido, Japan, to evaluate the influence of the flooding mud to marine sediments, promoted by the typhoon precipitation in August, 2003. We selected the Saru River as our target, and conducted the river water sampling and turbidity measurements along the main stream and a major branch called Nukabira River. Water samples were taken from the surface of flow center of each stream and stored in plastic bottles. The collected water was filtered through Millipore filter with 0.4 um opening and the suspended particles were collected and weighed in the laboratory. Mineral composition of the collected suspended materials on the filter was measured using an X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD).Distribution of the turbidity in the Saru River drainage shows that high turbid water is localized only to the Nukabira River and others are relatively clear. The turbidity seems to be supplied only from one local source. Mineral composition of the suspended material in the Nukabira River does not contain serpentine, while the upper main stream before the junction with the Nukabira River contain serpentine. The suspended material in the lower main stream is also characterized by the lack of serpentine because of higher contribution from the Nukabira River. The surface sediment at the mouth of the Saru River also shows the same character. We also examined the mineral composition of marine surface sediments supplied as flood mud during the typhoon event in August, 2003. The flood mud contains the major amount of serpentine, which was not expected from the mass budget of suspended materials from the upper main stream and the Nukabira River under usual condition.In order to estimate the suspension loads from the upper main stream and the Nukabira River, we compared the water discharge and suspension loads and established the rating curve for each tributary. Water discharge data for the main stream was available from the Water Information System of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan. However, since the database contains too many missing data for the Nukabira River after 2008, we calculated the water discharge for this branch using the Hydrometeorological and multi-Runoff Utility Model (Nakada et al., 2012). As a result, the rating curve of the upper main stream is steeper than that of the Nukabira River, and the suspension load of the upper main stream could be larger than the Nukabira River at the water discharge of >300 m3/s. Therefore, the Nukabira River transports 5-10 times more suspended materials than the main stream during the usual discharge, which is reversed during the flooding situation.