Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2014

Presentation information

Oral

Symbol M (Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary) » M-IS Intersection

[M-IS32_30AM2] Drilling Earth Science

Wed. Apr 30, 2014 11:00 AM - 12:45 PM 416 (4F)

Convener:*Saneatsu Saito(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Ken Ikehara(Institute of Geology and Geoinformation, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Tetsuro Hirono(Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University), Keita Umetsu(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Chair:Keita Umetsu(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Yusuke Yokoyama(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo)

12:00 PM - 12:15 PM

[MIS32-12] How the stress state changes with time in and aroud faults

*Kentaro OMURA1 (1.NIED)

Keywords:stress, fault, in-situ measurement, hydraulic fracture, borehole breakout, downhole measurement

It is an important factor for forecast a future earthquake how the strength of a fault plane is recovered and how the stress in and around the fault plane accumulate during an earthquake cycle. However, it is difficult to inspect the time variation of stress state in and around a faults in the field because the period of an earthquake cycle is very long. I introduce examples to be concerned with time variations of stress states by downhole in-situ stress measurement (Ikeda et al., 1996a; Ikeda et al., 1996b; Ikeda et al., 2001; Tsukahara et. al., 2001; Omura et al., 2004; Yamashita et al., 2004; Hickman and Zoback, 2004; Lin et al., 2007; Yabe et al., 2010; Yamashita et al., 2010; Yabe and Omura, 2011; Kuwahara et al., 2012; Ito et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2013). Those examples indicade that stress increases since after an earthquake toward the next earthquake. However, it is not clear whether the stress increase linearly with time, or change largely just after an earthquake, or increase rapidly just before the next earthquake. We need repeated measurements of in-situ stress to detect directly a time variation of stress state in and around a fault after an earthquake.Hickman, S., and M. Zoback, 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L15S12, doi:10.1029 2004GL020043Ikeda, R, K.Omura and Y.Iio,.H. Tsukahara, 1996a, Proc. VIIIth Int'l. Symp. on the Observation of the Continental Crust through Drilling, 30-35.Ikeda,R., Y.Iio and K.Omura, Y.Tanaka, 1996b, Proc. VIIIth Int'l. Symp. on the Observation of the Continental Crust through Drilling, 393-398.Ikeda, R., Y. Iio and K. Omura, 2001, The Island arc Special Issue. 10, Issue 3/4, 252-260.Kuwahara, Yasuto, Tsutomu Kiguchi, Xinglin Lei, Shengli Ma, Xueze Wen, and Shunyun Chen, 2012, Earth, Planets and Space, 64, 13-25.Lin, W., E.-C. Yeh, H. Ito, J.-H. Hung, T. Hirono, W. Soh, K.-F. Ma, M. Kinoshita, C.-Y. Wang, and S.-R. Song, 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16307, doi:10.1029 2007GL030515.Lin, Weiren, Marianne Conin, J. Casey Moore, Frederick M. Chester, Yasuyuki Nakamura, James J. Mori, Louise Anderson, Emily E. Brodsky, Nobuhisa Eguchi, and Expedition 343 Scientists, 2013, Science, 339, 687-690.Omura, K., R. Ikeda, T. Matsuda, A. Chiba, and Y. Mizuochi, 2004, Earth Monthly, extra edition No.46, 127-134.Tsukahara, H., Ikeda, R. and Yamamoto, K. , 2001, Island Arc, 10, 261-265.Yabe, Yasuo, Kiyohiko Yamamoto, Namiko Sato, and Kentaro Omura, 2010, Earth Planets Space, 62, 257-268.Yabe, Yasuo and Kentaro Omura, 2011, Island Arc, 20, 160-173.Yamashita, Furoshi, Eiichi Fukuyama and Kentaro Omura, 2004, Science, 306, 261-263.Yamashita, F., Mizoguchi, K., Fukuyama, E. and Omura, K., 2010, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04409, doi:10.1029 2009JB006287.