Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2014

Presentation information

Oral

Symbol M (Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary) » M-IS Intersection

[M-IS35_2AM2] Geopark

Fri. May 2, 2014 11:00 AM - 12:45 PM 211 (2F)

Convener:*Kuniyasu Mokudai(Pro Natura Foundation Japan), Takayuki Arima(Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University), Marekazu Ohno(Unzen Volcanic Area Geopark Promotion Council), Yoshihiro Hiramatsu(School of Natural System, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University), Takayuki Ogata(Faculty of Education, University of the Ryukyus), Mahito Watanabe(Institute of Geology and Geoinformation, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Chair:Takayuki Arima(Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University), Kuniyasu Mokudai(Pro Natura Foundation Japan)

11:00 AM - 11:15 AM

[MIS35-01] Global circumstance on Geopark

*Mahito WATANABE1 (1.Geological Survey of Japan,)

Keywords:Geopark, UNESCO, Global Geoparks Netork, Japanese Geoparks Network, Japan Geopark Committee

The concrpt of Geopark is getting tto be known to wide range of people in many countries including Japan, such as reserchers, citizens and officials in both municipal and central governments. Every people has every point of view on Geoparks. This situation will contribute to improve the concept of Geopark through the discussion of wide range of people.Global Geoparks Network (GGN) and UNESCO are discussing about the formal link between them in the worrking group composed of member country and GGN hosted by Ecololgy and Earth Science division of UNESCO. When the formalization of Geopark in UNESCO is achieved the present style of evaluating Geopark by GGN may change. As a UNESCO program, support to the least developing countries that try to establish Geopark is important and necessary. The discussion between member countries and GGN is good opportunity to review the activity of Geopark until present with the point of view from outside.In Japan, on-site evaluation by scientists and manager within Geoparks as well as members of Japan Geopark Committee (JGC) has started in 2012. It was a start of the peer review process between geoparks. Discussion on the policy to evaluate geoparks and candidate areas is getting more active since last May when first meeting on the evaluation policy between evaluators from JGC and geoparks. In those discussion they actively discuss on where Japanese geoparks go and how to promote geopark activity. The author will present the situation around Geopark as mentioned above and propose issues that should be discussed in the Japanese geopark community.