日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会

講演情報

インターナショナルセッション(ポスター発表)

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-TT 計測技術・研究手法

[S-TT13] Recent Advances in Exploration Geophysics (RAEG2015)

2015年5月27日(水) 18:15 〜 19:30 コンベンションホール (2F)

コンビーナ:*三ケ田 均(京都大学大学院工学研究科)、武川 順一(京都大学大学院工学研究科)、笠原 順三(静岡大学理学部地球科学科 東京海洋大学)、飯尾 能久(京都大学防災研究所)、小川 康雄(東京工業大学火山流体研究センター)、島 伸和(神戸大学大学院理学研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、佐藤 龍也(地熱技術開発株式会社)、淺川 栄一(株式会社 地球科学総合研究所)

18:15 〜 19:30

[STT13-P03] Interferometric location of microseismic events induced by gas storage operations

*Francesco GRIGOLI1Simone CESCA2 (1.Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Potsdam, Germany、2.GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Section 2.1 Earthquake and Volcano physics, Germany)

キーワード:Induced seismicity, Microseismic monitoring, Seismic event location, Seismic interferometry

Underground gas storage is a common industrial operation that consist in the injection of natural gas in aquifers, underground cavities or depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. Gas is seasonally injected or extracted to meet the market demand. Although these operations rarely stimulated seismicity, a recent case at the Castor platform in the offshore Spain was accompanied by a significant seismic sequence, culminated with a magnitude Mw 4.3 earthquake (Cesca et al. 2014). Ad hoc microseismic monitoring networks are nowadays extensively used to analyse the induced microseismicity generated by these industrial operations. However, in many cases, the lack of local microseismic monitoring networks limits the performance of the standard data analysis procedures. In such cases, non conventional methods need to be established. Within this context, we extend here the analysis of triggered seismicity related to gas injection at the Castor platform, in September-October 2013, where standard location procedures failed for magnitudes below Ml 2. In this work we relocate these low magnitude events using an interferometry based location method (Snieder and Vrijlandt, 2005). This technique exploits slight changes in the coda waves between two seismic events within a cluster. We proof that microseismic events can be classified in different families by combining a waveform correlation analysis and a clustering technique. Clustered events are characterized by a high similarity of waveforms, which implies a similarity in both source mechanism and location. In these conditions, the analysis of seismic coda recorded at a single receiver can be used to infer a measure of the spatial separation between two seismic sources. Coda waves are radiated in all directions with a radiation pattern determined by the source mechanism and a small change in the source position affects the interference pattern of the scattered waves that constitute the coda. This change in the coda waves is used to constrain the interevent distance for each events pair. Absolute locations can be then retrieved by considering all interevent distances, a procedure which requires at least three reference locations. We discuss the potential of the coda interferometry location approach to monitor triggered and induced seismicity, by relocating about 1000 seismic events of the September-October 2013 seismic sequence offshore Spain, close to the Castor project injection platform. Results are used to discuss the possible proposed faults scenarios.

References:
Cesca, S. et al. 2014, The 2013 September?October seismic sequence offshore Spain: a case of seismicity triggered by gas injection?, Geophys, Jour. Int., doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu172
Snieder, R., and Vrijlandt, M., 2005. Constraining the source separation with coda wave interferometry: Theory and application to earthquake doublets in the Hayward fault, California, J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2004JB003317