日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会

講演情報

口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM28] 磁気圏-電離圏ダイナミクス

2015年5月28日(木) 16:15 〜 18:00 302 (3F)

コンビーナ:*三好 由純(名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所)、長谷川 洋(宇宙航空研究開発機構宇宙科学研究所)、中野 慎也(情報・システム研究機構 統計数理研究所)、田中 良昌(国立極地研究所)、堀 智昭(名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所 ジオスペース研究センター)、座長:田中 良昌(国立極地研究所)

17:15 〜 17:30

[PEM28-15] 地球放射線帯電子の消失過程に関する研究: 磁気圏界面からの流出の評価

*千葉 貴司1小原 隆博1栗田 怜2三好 由純2 (1.東北大学 惑星プラズマ・大気研究センター、2.名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所)

キーワード:放射線帯, 消失過程

The Earth’s radiation belts consist of the inner and outer radiation belts, and these regions are composed of highly energetic electrons. Especially in the outer radiation belt, the energetic electron fluxes are highly variable during magnetic storms. Energetic electrons in the radiation belts sometimes cause satellite charging, resulting in gradual degradation of instruments and devices onboard satellites. Therefore, it is important to understand basic physics of the energetic electron variation in the outer radiation belt from the point of view of space weather. It has been considered that the drastic change of the outer radiation belt is controlled by the delicate balance between transport, acceleration and loss processes. However, each process has complex physical mechanisms and there remain still much outstanding questions.
In this study, we particularly focused on the loss processes. As a possible loss process, (i) precipitation to the atmosphere, (ii) Dst-effect and (iii) direct loss from the magnetopause (magnetopause shadowing) have been considered. The correlation between the magnetopause location and the outer boundary of the outer radiation belt was reported by Matsumura et al. [2011]. Turner et al. [2012] suggested that a rapid depression of outer belt electrons is caused by the sudden inward shift of the magnetopause and subsequent enhancement of outward radial diffusion. However, the regions where electrons escape and how the magnetopause shadowing effect reaches smaller L-value are still open questions.
In order to understand the effect of magnetopause shadowing, we used the concept of the drift shell splitting. Due to the asymmetric configuration of Earth’s magnetosphere, charged particles which have different pitch angles drift along the different drift shells. On the dayside, particles whose pitch angles are closer to 90 degrees have drift shells closer to the magnetopause. It is expected that, as a result of magnetopause shadowing, the pitch angle distribution will be the butterfly distribution. To investigate this hypothesis, we used Solid State Telescope (SST) onboard the THEMIS satellite and analyzed pitch angle distributions of energetic electrons.
Our result shows inward shift of dominant region of butterfly distribution when the magnetopause is compressed. We consider that this change is caused by the effect of inward shift of the magnetopause. However, the correlation coefficient between the magnetopause standoff distance and the shadowing region (the region where the effect of magnetopause shadowing is observed in the pitch angle distributions) is relatively low. It is because the effect of drift shell expansion due to the enhancement of the ring current. Then we calculate the largest L* which has last closed drift shell, L*max [Koller and Zaharia, 2011] and compared L*max with shadowing regions. The result shows good correlation and it supports the scenario that the electron loss is caused by the magnetopause shadowing.
However, our result also shows a little difference between loss and shadowing region. It means that the other loss processes are necessary to explain the total loss of outer belt electrons. We investigate this difference of the two by calculating 1-D Fokker Planck radial diffusion model. The simulation result supports the Turner’s scenario, magnetopause shadowing and subsequent enhancement of outward radial diffusion. However, strong radial diffusion coefficients are required to explain observation.
We also consider the precipitation loss to the atmosphere by using POES. POES can detect strong precipitation events. However, these precipitation events are not detected for all the events, there are some events which we can rarely detect strong precipitations. Thus, it is suggested that precipitation loss is not the main cause of loss but just the subsequent loss. However, we need to investigate further about precipitation loss.