Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2015

Presentation information

Oral

Symbol S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-GL Geology

[S-GL39] Geochronology and Isotope Geology

Sun. May 24, 2015 11:00 AM - 12:45 PM A03 (APA HOTEL&RESORT TOKYO BAY MAKUHARI)

Convener:*Takahiro Tagami(Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University), Yuji Sano(Division of Ocean and Earth Systems, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo), Chair:Yuji Sano(Division of Ocean and Earth Systems, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo), Takahiro Tagami(Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University)

12:00 PM - 12:15 PM

[SGL39-12] Geodynamic cycles of sulfur, carbon and nitrogen

*Takanori KAGOSHIMA1, Yuji SANO1 (1.Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo)

Keywords:sulfur flux, carbon flux, nitrogen flux, mid-ocean ridge basalt, hydrothermal fluid, volcanic gas

Sulfur has important roles not only in biological activities but in industry and medicine. However, its geochemical cycle between the mantle and the surface environments has not been well quantified. 3He, one of the primordial noble gas isotopes, is useful to investigate to evaluate S cycles. 3He fluxes from the mantle to atmosphere and ocean are well constrained, which enables us to use this isotope to estimate other volatile fluxes. The recent study reported S and C fluxes from the mantle to the surface environments based on He, S, and C isotopic compositions in MORB, hydrothermal fluids, and volcanic gases [1]. The fluxes were estimated with the recently reported 3He flux at ridges, 530 mol/y [2]. The S/3He ratio at MOR was calculated to be 1.9x108 as an average of S/3He ratios in six MORB vesicles (13N, 17S on EPR; 15N, 37N on MAR; 24S-25S on CIR) and 10 high temperature (>200℃) hydrothermal fluids (11N-47N, 17S-19S on EPR; 23N-38N on MAR). Multiplying this ratio and the 3He flux together, S flux at ridges was estimated to be 100 Gmol/y. An average S/3He ratio of 15 high temperature (>200℃) volcanic gases collected from circum-Pacific regions was calculated to be 6.5x109, providing S flux of 720 Gmol/y from arc volcanoes calibrating against 3He flux of 110 mol/y determined by its MOR flux. This flux is higher than that from ridges. However, S in volcanic gases does not originate only from the mantle. S/3He ratios and δ34S values in volcanic gases can be explained by mixing of three components: the upper mantle; subducted sedimentary pyrite; and subducted sulphate. The S contribution from the upper mantle was calculated to be 2.9% in volcanic gases, providing 21 Gmol/y from the mantle at arcs, which is lower than the S flux at ridges. Carbon flux at ridges was calculated to be 1200 Gmol/y using the CO2/3He ratio of 2.2x109 [3] based on compositions of MORB and hydrothermal fluids. An average CO2/3He ratio of 24 high temperature (>200℃) volcanic gases collected from circum-Pacific regions was calculated to be 2.0x1010, providing C flux of 2200 Gmol/y from arc volcanoes. CO2/3He ratios and δ13C values in volcanic gases can be explained by mixing of three components: the upper mantle; subducted organic sediments; and subducted limestone with slab [4]. The C contribution from the upper mantle was calculated to be 11% in volcanic gases, providing 240 Gmol/y from the mantle at arcs. The S and C fluxes from the mantle to atmosphere and ocean are 121 Gmol/y and 1440 Gmol/y, respectively. The C/S flux ratio was calculated to be 12, which is comparable to the surface inventory ratio of 13 [5]. This suggests that the main source of surface S and C is the upper mantle. Assuming steady-state surface environments, subducted amounts of S and C become 820 Gmol/y and 3400 Gmol/y, respectively. Then 15% of subducted S and 42% of subducted C do not return to the surface environments and recycle back into the depth. Nitrogen cycles will also be quantified and discussed in the current study.

Reference: [1] Kagoshima et al. (2015) Sci. Rep. 5, 8330. [2] Bianchi et al. (2010) EPSL 297, 379-386. [3] Marty & Tolstikhin (1998) Chem. Geol. 145, 233-248. [4] Sano & Marty (1995) Chem. Geol. 119, 265-274. [5] Hilton et al. (2002) RiMG 47, 319-370.