Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2015

Presentation information

Oral

Symbol S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-EM Earth's Electromagnetism

[S-EM34] Geomagnetism, paleomagnetism and rock magnetism

Sun. May 24, 2015 4:15 PM - 6:00 PM 102A (1F)

Convener:*Nobutatsu Mochizuki(Priority Organization for Innovation and Excellence, Kumamoto University), Masaki Matsushima(Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology), Chair:Yuhji Yamamoto(Center for Advanced Marine Core Research, Kochi University), Koji Fukuma(Department of Environmental System Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Doshisha University)

5:36 PM - 5:39 PM

[SEM34-P09] Relative paleointensity during the last 3 m.y. from sediments in the western equatorial Pacific

3-min talk in an oral session

*Yukihiro SAKURAMOTO1, Toshitsugu YAMAZAKI1, Katsunori KIMOTO2 (1.The University of Tokyo, 2.Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)

Keywords:paleomagnetic intensity, marine sediments

It is important to determine the strength of the past geomagnetic field for better understanding of the geodynamo. This study aims to estimate relative paleointensity of the geomagnetic field (RPI) back to about 3 Ma. Marine sediments can preserve temporally continuous paleomagnetic records. Piston core samples obtained from the West Caroline Basin (R/V MIRAI MR14-02 cruise, core PC01) were used. This area is empirically known for yielding good paleomagnetic records. Alternating field demagnetization of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) enabled to estimate directions of the past geomagnetic field. Ages of the sediments were estimated from the magnetic polarity reversal sequence. We are also trying age estimations based on the oxygen isotope stratigraphy. The anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) and the saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (sIRM) were imparted to normalize the NRM intensity for obtaining RPI. Here, the ARM was chosen for the normalizer. The result generally agrees with the previous RPI stacked curves of the last 2 m.y.. However, the RPI record seems to correlate with the ARM/sIRM ratio, which may reflect the variation in the sedimentary environment. Thus the RPI record may be influenced by environmental changes. We need to evaluate this influence for more reliable RPI estimation.