5:18 PM - 5:21 PM
[PPS22-P02] Development of precise in-situ U-Th-Pb dating of phosphate using LA-MC-ICP-MS
3-min talk in an oral session
Keywords:Parent body, Phosphate, U-Th-Pb geochronology, LA-ICP-MS
Problematic points which limit the analytical precision in in-situ U-Th-Pb age determination of phosphate using laser ablation ICP mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) are as followed: (1)error associated with large counting statistics derived from deficit of amount of sampling, (2)absence of age-homogeneous standard reference material of phosphate desired for precise measurement, (3)heterogeneity of Pb isotopic composition in standard reference material caused by non-radiogenic Pb which might be initially distributed in the material, (4)matrix effect associated with the difference of volatility between measured elements, (5) the isobaric interference on 204Pb from 204Hg. To overcome these problems, in this study, we tested the following approaches listed below: (a)enhancement of the total sensitivity through the improvement of interface region of ICP mass spectrometer and the integration of target material using multiple-spot ablation method5), (b)evaluation of the age homogeneity of Madagascar apatite6), (c)evaluation of the common-Pb correction for the standard reference material based on 207Pb method, (d)reduction of the matrix effect by utilizing the femtosecond laser ablation system and development of the method to evaluate the system closure using three isotope diagram for Pb, (e)test of isochron method based on normalization by 208Pb. To identify the suitable phase for analysis, in addition, imaging mass spectrometry for U, Th and Pb isotopes in large area (cm x cm order) by LA-ICP-MS is also tested, and the possibility of age determination using laser ablation in liquid method7) is estimated as well.
1)Gopel et al., Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 121, 153-171 (1994).
2)Allegre et al., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 1445-1456. (1995).
3)Yin et al., Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 49, 1426-1439 (2014).
4)Buhn et al., Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 81, 99-114 (2009).
5)Yokoyama et al., Analytical Chemistry, 83, 8892-8899 (2011).
6)Thomson et al., Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 13, 1-23 (2012).
7)Okabayashi et al., Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 26, 1393-1400 (2011).