Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2016

Presentation information

International Session (Poster)

Symbol A (Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences) » A-AS Atmospheric Sciences, Meteorology & Atmospheric Environment

[A-AS01] Global Carbon Cycle Observation and Analysis

Tue. May 24, 2016 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Poster Hall (International Exhibition Hall HALL6)

Convener:*Nobuko Saigusa(National Institute for Environmental Studies), Prabir Patra(Research Institute for Global Change, JAMSTEC), Toshinobu Machida(National Institute for Environmental Studies), Satoru Chatani(National Institute for Environmental Studies)

5:15 PM - 6:30 PM

[AAS01-P08] Validation of GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 retrieved by PPDF-S method

*Chisa Iwasaki1, Sachiko Hayashida2, Ryoichi Imasu1, Tatsuya Yokota3, Isamu Morino3, Yukio Yoshida3 (1.Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 2.Nara Women's University, 3.National Institute for Environmental Studies)

Keywords:GOSAT, retrieval, carbon dioxide, methane

We focused on column averaged dry air mole fraction of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 (XCO2 and XCH4, respectively) retrievals from Greenhouse gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) measurements through the photon path length probability density function (PPDF-S) based retrieval method that simultaneously retrieves target gas abundance and PPDF parameters. This method is used for an effective retrieval algorithm even under high concentration of clouds and aerosols. First, we validated PPDF-S XCO2 and XCH4 retrievals by comparing them with ground-based observations provided by the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) from June 2009 to May 2014. For comparison, we also validate retrievals through another algorithm using full physics (FP)-based retrieval method. PPDF-S and FP retrieval methods are different in way to account for light scattering effect. All these XCO2 and XCH4 retrievals are provided by the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). PPDF-S retrievals have positive biases (0.47 ± 2.11 ppm for XCO2 and 0.76 ± 15.49 ppb for XCH4), on the other hand, FP retrievals have negative biases (-0.28 ± 2.34 ppm for XCO2 and -2.16 ± 13.26 ppb for XCH4). Next, we compare global maps of XCO2 and XCH4 mean value, standard deviation and number of data between PPDF-S and FP retrievals. Over the ocean, PPDF-S method can retrieve large number of data whose standard deviation is larger than FP method. These PPDF-S retrievals over the ocean include data which are eliminated in post-screening process for FP method to exclude data that are strongly affected by clouds and aerosol.