*Urumu Tsunogai1, Takanori Miyauchi1, Takuya Ohyama1, Daisuke D. Komatsu1, Fumiko Nakagawa1, Yusuke Obata1,2
(1.Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, 2.Faculty of Bioresources, Mie University)
17O anomalies were used to quantify the influence of changes in land use and population density between each catchment area on the fate of atmospheric nitrate by determining the areal distribution and seasonal variation in stable isotopic compositions including the 17O anomalies (Δ17O) of nitrate for more than 30 streams within the same watershed. Nitrate in each inflow stream showed small annual average Δ17O values ranging from +0.5‰ to +3.1‰, which corresponds to the mixing ratios of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate to total nitrate from 1.8 ± 0.3% to 11.8 ± 1.8%, with 5.1 ± 0.5% as the average of all inflow streams. Although the annual average Δ17O values tended to be smaller in accordance with the increase in annual average nitrate concentration from 12.7 to 106.2 µmol L−1, the absolute concentrations of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate in the streams were almost stable at 2.3 ± 1.1 µmol L−1 irrespective of the changes in population density and land use in each catchment area. We conclude that changes in population density and land use between each catchment area had little impact on the concentration of atmospheric nitrate. Thus, the total nitrate concentration originated primarily from additional contribution of remineralized nitrate from both natural sources, having values of +4.4 ± 1.8‰ and −2.3 ± 0.9‰ for δ15N and δ18O, respectively, and anthropogenic sources having values of +9.2 ± 1.3‰ and −2.2 ± 1.1‰ for δ15N and δ18O, respectively. In addition, both the uniform absolute concentration of atmospheric nitrate and the low and uniform δ18O values of the remineralized portion of nitrate in the streams imply that in-stream removal of nitrate through assimilation or denitrification had small impact on the concentrations and stable isotopic compositions of nitrate in the streams, except for a few streams in summer having catchments of urban/suburban land uses. Additional measurements of the Δ17O values of nitrate together with δ15N and δ18O enabled us to exclude the contribution of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate from the determined δ15N and δ18O values of total nitrate and to use the corrected δ15N and δ18O values to evaluate the source and behaviour of the remineralized portion of nitrate in each stream.