Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2016

Presentation information


Symbol H (Human Geosciences) » H-CG Complex & General

[H-CG25] Nuclear Energy and Geoscience

Tue. May 24, 2016 1:45 PM - 3:15 PM 304 (3F)

Convener:*Eiji Sasao(Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Tsutomu Sato(Faculty of Engineering Hokkaido University), Hidekazu Yoshida(Nagoya University Museum), Chair:Eiji Sasao(Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency)

1:45 PM - 2:00 PM

[HCG25-13] Comparison of sorption coefficients between powder and intact solid phase: Case study with 133Cs and 87Sr on pumice tuff

*Mohammad Rajib1, Chiaki T. Oguchi2 (1.Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University/ Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, 2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Saitama University)

Keywords:Distribution coefficient, Powder and block samples, Oxidation, Pumice tuff, Radioactive waste repository

Adsorption experiment was carried out with both powdered and block pumice tuff to compare the distribution coefficient (Kd) values of stable cesium (133Cs) and strontium (87Sr) under variety of geochemical conditions. The main objective was to infer the Kd difference in laboratory and field condition. Cs and Sr were selected as two important nuclides from low and intermediate lever radioactive waste, and pumice tuff as one of the host rocks of such waste repositories. Pumice tuff blocks were prepared for this study expecting that the block sample is nearly the ‘natural condition’, like what is found in the field- compact with intact pores. Considering minimum dependency of ionic strength, initial nuclide concentration and pH, 10-4 mol/l Cs and Sr concentration was selected as initial experimental concentration (Rajib et al., 2015, 2016) where 4, 8 and 12 were chosen as low, neutral and high pH conditions. Since ionic strength significantly influences Kd at less than 1.0 mol/l on pumice tuff (Rajib et al., 2011, 2016), relatively high ionic strength of 1.0 and 3.0 mol/l was adopted. To keep the effect of particle size at minimum, homogenous grain size of 150-300 μm was used for the powdered materials, whereas blocks were prepared at an equal size of 1 cm3. Conventional batch technique was carried out with a solid-solution ratio of 1:10. However, as the ratio cannot be kept fixed for block samples (the weight varied from 1.090 to 1.456 g), adjustment to 1:10 ratio was necessary to recalculate Kd values. After reaching equilibrium pH at the contact time of 14 weeks, Cs and Sr concentrations were measured by ICP-MS, and the Kd values were determined considering the natural dissolution of Cs and Sr during aging period (Rajib et al., 2015). Pumice tuff samples were collected from below 50-100 m at subsurface where water-rock interaction occurred and a redox zone has been formed. Hence, both fresh and oxidized pumice tuffs were possible to use to observe any oxidation effect. To investigate surface area properties of pumice tuff, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and observation through scanning electron microscope (SEM) was conducted.
The results show that Kd values for block samples are considerably lower than powdered samples for both Cs and Sr. Almost all the samples showed similar tendency with the average lower values of 8.79% for Cs and 4.94% for Sr in block samples of fresh tuff. In oxidized tuff, block samples showed 14.58% and 13.65% lower values for Cs and Sr, respectively. The lower Kd values on block samples might be due to the use of lower surface area as sorption sites since many closed pores exist in intact solid which cannot be accessed. The destruction of smaller pores in oxidized tuff due to oxidation phenomena might be the cause of higher reducing Kd values. However, use of pumice tuff blocks for comparable batch adsorption experiment is possible due to its highly porous nature where much amount of surface area can be accessed. The Kd difference between block and powder samples is expected to be caused mainly by the effect of diffusion, taking very long equilibrium period, and the physical and mechanical properties of pores and fractures during experiment.
1. Rajib, M., Kobayashi, T. Oguchi C. T. and Sasaki T. (2016), Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4.
2. Rajib, M., Oguchi C. T., Sasaki T. and Kobayashi, T. (2015), Geochemical Journal, 49(5), 539-548.
3. Rajib, M., Sasaki, T., Kobayashi, T., Myaguchi, Y., Takagi, I. and Moriyama, H. (2011), Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 48(6), 950-957.