日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会

講演情報

ポスター発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-GI 地球科学一般・情報地球科学

[M-GI22] 計算科学による惑星形成・進化・環境変動研究の新展開

2016年5月24日(火) 17:15 〜 18:30 ポスター会場 (国際展示場 6ホール)

コンビーナ:*牧野 淳一郎(理化学研究所計算科学研究機構)、林 祥介(神戸大学・大学院理学研究科 惑星学専攻/惑星科学研究センター(CPS))、井田 茂(東京工業大学大学院理工学研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、相川 祐理(筑波大学計算科学研究センター)、小河 正基(東京大学大学院総合文化研究科広域科学専攻)、梅村 雅之(筑波大学計算科学研究センター)

17:15 〜 18:30

[MGI22-P02] メッシュフリー法における自由表面と接触不連続面への適応

*山本 智子1,2牧野 淳一郎4,2,3 (1.東京工業大学理工学研究科、2.理化学研究所計算科学機構、3.東京工業大学ELSI、4.神戸大学理学研究科)

キーワード:流体計算手法

In Earth and Planetary Sciences, mesh-free methods for compressive fluids are widely used for fluid simulations in which large deformations occur. As a traditional mesh-free method, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (Lucy 1977 and Gingold & Monaghan 1977; hereafter SPH) is generally used. However, SPH cannot accurately handle free surfaces and contact discontinuities, where the density distribution is not differentiable.
There are two causes for this limitation. First, in many of mesh-free methods, the density of a fluid element is derived directly from the distribution of fluid elements instead of using the equation of continuity. However, the approximation formula in which the density can be derived without implicit method, does not satisfy partition of unity, causing an error. Second, the physical quantities and derivatives are estimated by the SPH approximation formula. This formula is zeroth-order accurate in space and second-order accuracy with respect to the number of neighbor fluid particles which interact with a fluid particle. Therefore there are large errors at free surfaces and contact discontinuities.
To solve this problem, we developed a high-order mesh-free method for compressive fluid. As a solution for the first problem, we integrate the equation of continuity in the new method. In addition, for the second problem, we adapt a space high-order approximation formula to mesh-free methods for compressive fluids. The formula is based on Tamai et al. (2013), in which they formulate a high-order approximation for mesh-free methods for incompressible fluids. Then we express free surface with the boundary condition which the pressure is constant. In addition, for contact discontinuities, we introduce the appropriate boundary condition depending on what it is a contact discontinuity.
We also compare the results of numerical tests of our new method to the results of SPH. These results show that our method can handle free surfaces and contact discontinuities better than SPH. However, the new method cannot accurately handle contact discontinuities with indifferentiable pressure. Therefore, we need other prescriptions for these contact discontinuities, which we will address in future work.