日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会

講演情報

口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-IS ジョイント

[M-IS06] 生物地球化学

2016年5月22日(日) 13:45 〜 15:15 A03 (アパホテル&リゾート 東京ベイ幕張)

コンビーナ:*楊 宗興(東京農工大学)、柴田 英昭(北海道大学北方生物圏フィールド科学センター)、大河内 直彦(海洋研究開発機構)、山下 洋平(北海道大学 大学院地球環境科学研究院)、座長:稲垣 善之(森林総合研究所)、藤井 一至(森林総合研究所)、和穎 朗太(農業環境技術研究所 物質循環研究領域)、仁科 一哉(国立環境研究所)

14:00 〜 14:15

[MIS06-14] カメルーン東部・森林-サバンナ境界域における土壌微生物動態の解明―森林とサバンナの比較

*杉原 創1藤盛 瑤子2柴田 誠2Mvondo Ze Antonie3舟川 晋也2小﨑 隆4 (1.東京農工大学大学院農学研究院、2.京都大学大学院農学研究科、3.Dschang大学、4.首都大学東京)

キーワード:窒素・リン動態、土壌微生物動態、森林ーサバンナ遷移帯、熱帯アフリカ

The forest–savanna transition zone is widely distributed on nutrient-poor Oxisols in central Africa. Our previous studies of soil nutrient stock in this area showed that forest is likely N rich and P limited ecosystems, due to the N-fixation tree, though savanna is likely N limited ecosystems. To reveal and compare the nutrient flow in relation to soil microbes for forest and savanna vegetation in this area, we evaluated seasonal fluctuations in microbial biomass carbon (MBC), nitrogen (MBN), and phosphorus (MBP) for 1 year as well as soil moisture, temperature, soil pH, and extractable soil nutrients for both vegetation types in eastern Cameroon. Soil pH was significantly lower in forest (4.3) than in savanna (5.6), and soil extractable N was larger in forest (87.1 mg N kg−1 soil) than in savanna (32.9 mg N kg−1 soil). We found a significant positive correlation between soil moisture and MBP in forest, indicating the importance of organic P mineralization for MBP, whereas in savanna, we found a significant positive correlation between soil N availability and MBP, indicating N limitation for MBP. These results indicate that forest is an N-saturated and P-limited ecosystem, whereas savanna is an N-limited ecosystem for soil microbes. Interestingly, we observed a significantly lower MBN and larger MB C:N ratio in forest (50.7 mg N kg−1 soil and 8.6, respectively) than in savanna (60.0 mg N kg−1 soil and 6.5, respectively) during the experimental period, despite the rich soil N condition in forest. This may be due to the significantly lower soil pH in forest, which influences the different soil microbial communities (fungi-to-bacteria ratio) in forest versus savanna, and therefore, our results indicate that, in terms of microbial N dynamics, soil pH rather than soil substrate conditions controls the soil microbial communities in this area.