日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会

講演情報

口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-IS ジョイント

[M-IS12] 結晶成長、溶解における界面・ナノ現象

2016年5月22日(日) 09:00 〜 10:30 A07 (アパホテル&リゾート 東京ベイ幕張)

コンビーナ:*木村 勇気(北海道大学低温科学研究所)、三浦 均(名古屋市立大学大学院システム自然科学研究科)、塚本 勝男(大阪大学大学院工学研究科)、佐藤 久夫(三菱マテリアル株式会社エネルギー事業センター那珂エネルギー開発研究所)、座長:佐藤 久夫(三菱マテリアル株式会社エネルギー事業センター那珂エネルギー開発研究所)

10:15 〜 10:30

[MIS12-05] 塩素酸ナトリウム水溶液中の銀ナノ粒子円偏光光学捕捉により誘起されるキラル結晶化におけるキラリティの偏り

*新家 寛正1杉山 輝樹2田川 美穂3村山 健太3原田 俊太3宇治原 徹3 (1.国立大学法人千葉大学融合科学研究科附属分子キラリティ研究センター、2.台湾国立交通大学応用化学系および分子科学研究所、3.国立大学法人名古屋大学未来材料・システム研究所未来エレクトロニクス集積研究センター)

キーワード:キラル結晶化、レーザー誘起結晶化、円偏光、金属ナノ粒子、局在型表面プラズモン

Chiral crystallization, in which chirality emerges spontaneously in the course of crystallization, has been received attention from the viewpoint of emergence of chirality. Thus, the exploration of physical factors that induce a chiral bias in chiral crystallization provides implications for the origin of biohomochirality. Asymmetric interaction between circularly polarized light (CPL) and chiral compound, i.e. circular dichroism (CD), has been considered as a candidate for the origin of biohomochirality,[1]. Many previous studies on photosynthesis of chiral molecule have proven that asymmetric light-matter interaction induces slight chiral bias in enantiomeric ratio of reaction product, so far.[2] However, light-based chiral bias in chiral crystallization still remains unreported. Two conceivable reasons may exist: (1) CD is intrinsically small, (2) there is no investigation on chiral bias by CPL-induced chiral crystallization with a guarantee of optical field effect on nucleation. We overcome these difficulties by two strategies: (1) the plasmonic enhancement of CD [3] and (2) continuous-wave (CW) laser-induced nucleation [4]. In this presentation, we report the first demonstration of significant chiral bias in NaClO3 chiral crystallization by irradiating a tightly-focused circularly polarized CW laser at the interface between air and a NaClO3 solution containing plasmonic AgNPs.
A CW CPL green laser (532 nm, 940±5 mW, ellipticity ›93%) was focused onto the air-liquid interface of the undersaturated NaClO3 solution containing AgNPs by using a 60× objective lens (NA = 0.9) equipped on an inverted polarized light microscope. We repeated crystallization and chirality identification of the NaClO3 crystal 100 times and 100 times by using l- and r-CPL, respectively. The number of the resulting enantiomorphs was counted.
As the result of the laser irradiation, crystallization occured from the focal spot. The crystallization using l-CPL(r-CPL) yielded l-enantiomorph 42(65) times and d-enanitomorph 58(35) times, respectively, indicating that the d-(l-)enantiomorph was dominant over the l-(d-)enantiomorph. Namely, the “dominant” enantiomorph can be switchable by switching the handedness of incident CPL, i.e. the chiral bias is enantioselective. In total, the “dominant” enantiomorph crystallized 123 times out of 200 crystallization. This chiral bias is statistically significant because the number of the “dominant” enantiomorph deviates 99% interval of the binomial distribution B(n,p) = B(200,0.5), where n is the number of trials and p is the probability that the “dominant” enantiomorph crystallizes out (Figure 1). This deviation demonstrates that the probability p is more than 0.5, i.e. the probability of the occurrence of each enantiomorph is no longer equal.
We found that the crystallization of NaClO3 chiral crystal can be induced by the irradiation of tightly focused CPL laser (532 nm) at the interface between air and NaClO3 solution containing AgNPs. We also found that this crystallization method can cause a statistically-significant chiral bias in the probability of crystallization of both of the enantiomorphs. Moreover, the “dominant” enantiomorph is found to be switchable by changing the handedness of CPL. Our results may provide implications for the origin of biohomochirality.
[1] W. A. Bonner, Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 21(2), (1991), 59.
[2] B. L. Feringa, R. A. v. Delden, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, (1999), 3418.
[3] Y. Zhang, C. Gu, A. M. Schwartzberg, S. Chen and J. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 73, (2006), 165405.
[4] T. Sugiyama, T. Adachi, H. Masuhara, Chem. Lett. 36(12), (2007), 1480.