日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会

講演情報

インターナショナルセッション(口頭発表)

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM04] Space Weather, Space Climate, and VarSITI

2016年5月22日(日) 13:45 〜 15:15 103 (1F)

コンビーナ:*片岡 龍峰(国立極地研究所)、プルキネン アンティ(NASAゴダード宇宙飛行センター)、海老原 祐輔(京都大学生存圏研究所)、三好 由純(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、清水 敏文(宇宙航空研究開発機構宇宙科学研究所)、浅井 歩(京都大学宇宙総合学研究ユニット)、陣 英克(情報通信研究機構)、佐藤 達彦(日本原子力研究開発機構)、草野 完也(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、宮原 ひろ子(武蔵野美術大学造形学部)、伊藤 公紀(横浜国立大学大学院工学研究院)、塩川 和夫(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、中村 卓司(国立極地研究所)、余田 成男(京都大学大学院理学研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、一本 潔(京都大学大学院理学研究科附属天文台)、石井 守(国立研究開発法人情報通信研究機構)、座長:Pulkkinen Antti Aleksi(The National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

14:25 〜 14:45

[PEM04-14] Solar Origin of a Sequence of SEP-Producing CMEs via the "Lid Removal" Mechanism

★招待講演

*Alphonse Sterling1 (1.NASA/MSFC)

キーワード:Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) Onset, Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs), Solar Filament Eruptions, Solar Flares

Both coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar energetic particle (SEP) events are of concern for space weather. Here we report on the solar source of a pair of CMEs that produced a strong SEP event. The CMEs resulted from back-to-back ejective eruptions from a single active region on 2012 January 23. We examine the onset of these eruptions using magnetograms and EUV images from the HMI and AIA instruments on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) spacecraft, and EUV images from the STEREO spacecraft. Cheng et al. (2013) showed that the first eruption's (``Eruption 1'') flux rope was apparent only in ``hotter'' AIA channels, and that it removed overlying field that allowed the second eruption (``Eruption 2'') to begin via ideal MHD instability; here we say Eruption 2 began via a ``lid removal'' mechanism. We show that during Eruption-1's onset, its flux rope underwent ``tether weakening'' (TW) reconnection with the field of an adjacent active region. Standard flare loops from Eruption 1 developed over Eruption-2's flux rope and enclosed filament, but these overarching new loops were unable to confine that flux rope/filament. Eruption-1's flare loops, from both TW reconnection and standard-flare-model internal reconnection, were much cooler than Eruption-2's flare loops (GOES thermal temperatures of ~9 MK compared to ~14 MK). This eruption sequence produced a strong solar energetic particle (SEP) event (10 MeV protons, >10^3 pfu for 43 hrs), apparently starting when Eruption-2's CME blasted through Eruption-1's CME at 5---10 R_s. This occurred because the two CMEs originated in close proximity and in close time sequence: Eruption-1's fast rise started soon after the TW reconnection; the lid removal by Eruption-1's ejection triggered the slow onset of Eruption 2; and Eruption-2's CME, which started ~1 hr later, was three times faster than Eruption-1's CME.