Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2016

Presentation information

International Session (Oral)

Symbol S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-SS Seismology

[S-SS04] Rethinking Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Sun. May 22, 2016 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM 201B (2F)

Convener:*Danijel Schorlemmer(GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences), Matt Gerstenberger(GNS Science), Ken Xiansheng Hao(National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster(NIED)), Marco Pagani(Global Earthquake Model), Chair:Matt Gerstenberger(GNS Science), Ken Xiansheng Hao(National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster(NIED)), Schorlemmer Danijel(GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)

4:45 PM - 5:00 PM

[SSS04-06] Applicability of NGA-West 2 GMPEs to Japan: how to evaluate models using correlated observations

*Sum Mak1, Danijel Schorlemmer1 (1.Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ)

Keywords:Ground motion prediction equation

We compared the performance between the newly developed NGA-West 2 GMPEs and native Japanese GMPEs. The dataset set we used was the most comprehensive among similar studies, consisting of 16 earthquakes of Mw 5.5-6.9, each producing at least 8 records within 40 km to the epicenter. The observations were not used in creating the GMPEs under evaluation, so the test was truly prospective and assessed directly the predictive power of the models. The NGA-West 2 GMPEs was found to perform better than older models.
We emphasize two issues of GMPE evaluation that have been less explored in the literature. Firstly, observed ground motions are believed to be correlated, and are modelled to be correlated. Such a correlation should be duly respected in the evaluation. Secondly, the observation can be considered as a realization of some random process, and so the performance metric, whatever it is, is also a random variable. Such uncertainty should be considered when assessing whether one model is better than the other. We handled the data correlation by treating the observed ground motions as one multivariate random variable. We assessed the uncertainty of evaluation by a cluster bootstrap.