5:15 PM - 6:30 PM
[SVC47-P11] Measurements of soil CO2 flux at Asama volcano, Japan before and after minor eruptions in June 2015
Keywords:Asama volcano, Soil CO2 flux, Fluid ascent
At Asama volcano, Japan, minor eruptions occurred on 16th and 19th June 2015 that were the first eruptions since 2009. After these eruptions, a measurement of soil CO2 flux was conducted on 29th October 2015. Here we compare the data of 2015 to those of inactive period in 2012–2014 [Morita et al., Bull. Volcanol., accepted] and discuss on fluid ascent before and after the 2015 eruptions.
Soil CO2 flux was measured using an accumulation chamber method [Parkinson, 1981, J. Appl. Ecol.; Baubron et al., 1990, Nature; Chiodini et al., 1998, Appl. Geochem.] at 54 sampling points in the eastern side of Kamayama flank and Maekake crater rim. A spatial distribution of measured flux was obtained from an average of 100 realizations by sequential Gaussian simulation [Deutsch and Journel, 1998; Cardellini et al., 2003, J. Geophys. Res.].
As a result, a spatial distribution of high soil CO2 flux anomalies in eastern Kamayama flank and eastern Maekake crater rim is similar to that for the 2012–2014 observations reported in Morita et al. [Bull. Volcanol., accepted]. Comparing the flux values of the 2015 and the 2012–2014 measurements, an average flux of the 100 realizations was about 5–10 times higher in eastern Maekake crater rim and was not changed or a little lower around Kamayama crater rim. Morita et al. [Bull. Volcanol., accepted] reported that soil CO2 emitted from the eastern side of the summit probably ascend from a hydrothermal fluid layer corresponding to a low electrical resistive body that resides in the shallow part of the volcano flank [Aizawa et al., 2008, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.]. The increase of soil CO2 flux in eastern Maekake crater rim likely reflect an increasing supply of magmatic volatiles to the hydrothermal fluid layer from the depth. Different responses of soil CO2 flux between Kamayama and Maekake crater rims may correspond to differences of fluid pathway and ascent process. To ascertain relations between soil CO2 flux variations and the fluid ascent process from the depth, further repeated observations of soil CO2 flux and detailed comparisons to the volcanic activity are necessary.