日本地球惑星科学連合2018年大会

講演情報

[EE] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-AS 大気科学・気象学・大気環境

[A-AS03] 最新の大気科学:台風研究の新展開~過去・現在・未来

2018年5月23日(水) 13:45 〜 15:15 201A (幕張メッセ国際会議場 2F)

コンビーナ:中野 満寿男(海洋研究開発機構)、和田 章義(気象研究所台風研究部)、金田 幸恵(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所、共同)、伊藤 耕介(琉球大学)、座長:金田 幸恵(名古屋大学)、和田 章義(気象研究所)

14:15 〜 14:45

[AAS03-15] Double warm-core structure of Typhoon Lan (2017) observed by dropsondes during T-PARCII

★Invited Papers

*山田 広幸1坪木 和久2長浜 則夫3清水 健作3大東 忠保4篠田 太郎2伊藤 耕介1山口 宗彦5中澤 哲夫5 (1.琉球大学、2.名古屋大学、3.明星電気、4.京都大学、5.気象庁気象研究所)

キーワード:台風、航空機観測、暖気核構造

A jet airplane (Gulfstream-II) with two newly-developed GPS dropsonde receivers was used to examine the inner core of Typhoon Lan (2017), as part of the Tropical Cyclones-Pacific Asian Research Campaign for the Improvement of Intensity Estimations/Forecasts (T-PARCII). During the first flight with several eye soundings in 0500-0700 UTC on 21 October, this typhoon was in its mature stage with a central pressure of 915 hPa. Satellite imagery showed the annular structure of this typhoon, with roughly 90-km diameter of the eye and surrounding axisymmetric eyewall convection. The flight route was initially designed to go around the eyewall convection, but was modified to go into the eye. This decision was made in flight using a weather avoidance radar. The airplane flew at 43,000 feet (~13.7 km) of altitude, and totally 8 and 10 dropsondes were deployed in the eye and around the eyewall, respectively. The deployment from this altitude enabled us to examine thermodynamic features of the eye in the lower and middle troposphere and marginally in the upper troposphere. Vertical profile of the eye soundings showed the warm core structure extending from the lower through upper troposphere, with two peaks near 3 km (~ 700 hPa) and above 12 km MSL (< 200 hPa). Potential temperature anomaly was estimated using a local reference sounding obtained at 0600UTC at the JMA 47945 site, which was at 400-km north of the eye. The estimated anomalies were approximately +12 K on average and +16 K at both the lower and upper peaks. The height and strength of the upper peak was basically consistent with those reported in the previous observational studies. In contrast, the height of lower peak was about 2 km lower than that reported in many of the previous studies.