Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2018

Presentation information

[EE] Evening Poster

S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-IT Science of the Earth's Interior & Tectonophysics

[S-IT20] Structure and Dynamics of Earth and Planetary Mantles

Mon. May 21, 2018 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Poster Hall (International Exhibition Hall7, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Takashi Yoshino(Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University), Dapeng Zhao(Department of Geophysics, Tohoku University), Takashi Nakagawa(海洋研究開発機構数理科学・先端技術研究分野)

[SIT20-P07] Simultaneous measurement of thermal conductivity and diffusivity for fayalite and its γ- phase

*Youyue Zhang1, Takashi Yoshino1, Masahiro Osako2 (1.Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University, 2.National Museum of Nature and Science)

Keywords:Thermal conductivity, Fayalite, Ahrensite, Heat capacity, High pressure

Knowledge of thermal properties of mantle materials under high pressure and high temperature are essential for a quantitative understanding of the thermal state and dynamics of the Earth’s interior. Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity, the most fundamental thermal properties, play a key role in controlling the heat transport in thermal boundary layer which provides the energy for the dynamic earth. Fayalite is the iron end member of olivine, which is the dominating mineral in the Earth’s upper mantle. Under high pressure, fayalite undergoes a phase transition to ahrensite(γ- phase), the iron end member of ringwoodite. Numerous studies on thermal properties of Mg2SiO4 polymorphs have been performed, on the contrary, much less knowledge of Fe2SiO4 polymorphs has been obtained. Information about heat capacity of Fe2SiO4 polymorphs under high pressure and high temperature is also not sufficient. We applied a pulse heating method to simultaneously measure the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity for fayalite and its high pressure polymorph. The sample was sintered fayalite synthesized by piston-cylinder apparatus. We measured up to 5 GPa and 1000K for fayalite and 12 GPa and 1000K for γ- phase. The difference between fayalite and ahrensite was readily distinguished. Heat capacities of fayalite and ahrensite were calculated using the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity from measurement results. The heat capacity of ahrensite is apparently lower than fayalite which is different from the case of Mg2SiO4 forsterite and ringwoodite according to previous study. The heat capacity of fayalite and ahrensite under room pressure is also higher than previous data. Considering the error from the noise of the raw data, we will perform another experiment to obtain data of higher quality. We expect to present some better results.

Osako et al. (2004) Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 143-144, 311-320

Yong et al. (2007) Phys Chem Minerals, 34, 121-127

R.A. Robie (1982) America Mineralogist, 67, 463-469

Kojitani (2012) America Mineralogist, 97, 1314-1319