10:05 AM - 10:20 AM
[HCG26-05] Difference in the restarting farming processes by the suffering and refuge circumstances
Keywords:restarting farming process, diversity of restarting farming, the suffering and refuge circumstances, Tsunami disaster area, nuclear-power disaster area, verification about accident correspondence and a rehabilitation policy
There is an area where suffering and refuge circumstances are different depending on influence of nuclear-power disaster by the Great East Japan Earthquake. Evacuation directive was released in many areas in now, and farming is resumed. The situation of the restarting farming is different respectively in these areas. So a relation between the difference in the suffering and refuge circumstances and the restarting farming process was considered. Research places are a Tsunami disaster area and a nuclear-power disaster area.
In Tsunami disaster area, most farmlands are reconstructed, and the same agriculture as before an earthquake disaster is resumed. The person who took refuge was a small number. And they took refuge in neighborhood. So farmers could discuss agriculture after restarting farming. The subsidy of the government is being utilized greatly.
Minami-Soma is within the 20km from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. At the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, people in Minami-soma had to take refuge quickly, so livestock farmers couldn't make them take refuge from cattle. That's a bruise at their heart. Therefore they can't resume stockbreeding. They resumed only production of feed.
People in Iitate didn't take refuge immediately after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, so livestock farmers could make refuge or sell their cattle. Therefore there were no psychological barriers of stockbreeding resumption.
We have to understand diversity of restarting farming by the difference in the areas. And we have to verify about accident correspondence and a rehabilitation policy.
In Tsunami disaster area, most farmlands are reconstructed, and the same agriculture as before an earthquake disaster is resumed. The person who took refuge was a small number. And they took refuge in neighborhood. So farmers could discuss agriculture after restarting farming. The subsidy of the government is being utilized greatly.
Minami-Soma is within the 20km from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. At the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, people in Minami-soma had to take refuge quickly, so livestock farmers couldn't make them take refuge from cattle. That's a bruise at their heart. Therefore they can't resume stockbreeding. They resumed only production of feed.
People in Iitate didn't take refuge immediately after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, so livestock farmers could make refuge or sell their cattle. Therefore there were no psychological barriers of stockbreeding resumption.
We have to understand diversity of restarting farming by the difference in the areas. And we have to verify about accident correspondence and a rehabilitation policy.