日本地球惑星科学連合2018年大会

講演情報

[EE] 口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-GI 地球科学一般・情報地球科学

[M-GI23] Open Science as a New Paradigm: Research Data Sharing, Infrastructure, Scientific Communications, and Beyond

2018年5月23日(水) 13:45 〜 15:15 103 (幕張メッセ国際会議場 1F)

コンビーナ:村山 泰啓(国立研究開発法人情報通信研究機構 戦略的プログラムオフィス)、近藤 康久(総合地球環境学研究所)、Cecconi Baptiste(LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, PSL Research University、共同)、Toczko Sean(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)、座長:Baptiste Cecconi(LESIA - Observatoire de Paris)、Sean Toczko(JAMSTEC)

14:00 〜 14:15

[MGI23-02] Challenges for developing Open Science Policy: Gap and Diversity to Transform Science

*林 和弘1 (1.文部科学省科学技術・学術政策研究所)

キーワード:オープンサイエンス、過渡期のギャップ、ソーシャルチェンジ、関係者の再構築

Open Science is a current important issue for policy makers which is expected to lead a new knowledge basis for innovation by transforming science. Currently policies are aiming to share research outputs focusing on research article and data as much as possible to advance Science, to recognize contributors more precisely, and to make social impacts more efficiently. In addition, one of the extreme goals of Open Science policy is fostering a new culture for researchers based on digital native infrastructure, which needs social change by researchers themselves. For that goal, some gaps have been already observed in the transition state of transforming science. Gaps are classed as 1) a gap of research area, 2) a gap of researchers' attitude, 3) a gap among stakeholders (between researchers and librarians), and 4) a gap between incremental and discontinuous methods for the future of publishing and sharing. Those gaps heavily affect to setting and implementation of open science policy, such as data policy development, data management, and defining asset of research data to manage, share and preserve. Perusing a digital native media for publication or even intending a whole digital research platform from getting ideas to make research outputs public, Open Science policy should be designed with multivariable decisions observing ICT advancement and industry development, generation transfer of researchers, changes of research evaluation, and acceptance of changes by researchers. Then it is reasonable to think that current stakeholders must analyze core-competence as meta-level with recognition of social changes. It is to transform its function, not its organization itself, to digital native paradigm developing a new framework of stakeholder, which mitigate gap significantly.