日本地球惑星科学連合2018年大会

講演情報

[EE] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM15] Dynamics in magnetosphere and ionosphere

2018年5月20日(日) 13:45 〜 15:15 303 (幕張メッセ国際会議場 3F)

コンビーナ:田中 良昌(国立極地研究所)、堀 智昭(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、中溝 葵(情報通信研究機構 電磁波研究所、共同)、尾崎 光紀(金沢大学理工研究域電子情報学系)、座長:海老原 祐輔(京都大学生存圏研究所)、長谷川 洋(JAXA宇宙科学研究所)

14:00 〜 14:15

[PEM15-14] Characteristics of ionospheric electric field oscillations associated with Sudden Commencement observed by SuperDARN radars and ground magnetometers

飯田 剛平1、*西谷 望1堀 智昭1 (1.名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)

キーワード:SuperDARN、太陽風動圧変動、SC、電離圏電場振動

Sudden Commencement (SC) is observed mainly as a sudden increase of the H-component of geomagnetic field at low latitudes. Similarly, it is also observed as a rapid increase of SYM-H index. Past studies showed that it is caused by a sudden compression of the magnetosphere associated with rapid increases of the solar wind dynamic pressure. At middle and high latitudes, SCs cause perturbations associated with twin vortex type ionospheric currents [Araki, 1994]. It was reported that the disturbances of the ionospheric current and the electric field at high latitude associated with SC consists typically of the Preliminary Impulse (PI) and the Main Impulse (MI). Sometimes they are accompanied by damped oscillations lasting for about several tens of minutes to an hour with periods of several minutes. Previous studies report that the oscillations associated with SC are seen by geomagnetic observations [e.g. Saito and Matsushita, 1967; Fukunishi, 1979] and satellites [e.g. Nagano and Araki, 1985]. In recent years they are also observed by SuperDARN radars in the ionosphere [e.g., Thorolfsson et al., 2001; Hori et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2013]. The reason why both types of SC-associated disturbances can occur, however, have not yet been understood well. We examine the cause of the difference between the two kinds of SC events, using SuperDARN radars in the northern hemisphere covering ~40 to 90 degree geomagnetic latitudes. For the analyzed period from January 2011 to June 2017, 309 SC events were identified and 74 events out of them were accompanied by the ionospheric electric field oscillations immediately following MIs, as observed by at least one SuperDARN radar. We contrast 235 events (only PI and MI) with 74 events (oscillation following MIs) and find that the magnitude of solar wind dynamic pressure and speed change does not seem to be the cause of the difference between the two types of disturbance associated with SC events. On the other hand, the larger the variation of them per one minute is, the higher the occurrence rate of electric field oscillations is. Regarding the magnetic local time (MLT) dependence of the ionospheric electric field oscillations, the occurrence rate is low in 9-15 MLT. The seasonal variation of the occurrence rate tends to be low in summer. Judging from the comparison with the theoretical analysis of MHD waves by Newton et al. (1978), the cause of this tendency is not Joule heating in the ionospherem. Instead we suggest that the occurrence rate in the ionosphere reflects the occurrence frequency distribution in the magnetosphere, as reported by Nagano and Araki (1985).