Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2018

Presentation information

[EJ] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-RD Resources, Mineral Deposit & Resource Exploration

[S-RD33] Resource Geology

Wed. May 23, 2018 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM A11 (Tokyo Bay Makuhari Hall)

convener:Tsubasa Otake(Division of Sustainable Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University), Daisuke Araoka(Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Ryohei Takahashi(秋田大学大学院国際資源学研究科, 共同), Tatsuo Nozaki(Research and Development Center for Submarine Resources, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Chairperson:Otake Tsubasa(Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University), Takahashi Ryohei(Faculty of International Resource Sciences, Akita University)

9:00 AM - 9:30 AM

[SRD33-01] Cu mineralization processes in hydrothemal deposits

★Invited Papers

*Yasushi Watanabe1, Adi Sulaksono1, Ryuya Sato2, Shoto Satori1 (1.Graduate School of International Resource Sciences, Akita University, 2.JX Nippon Exploration and Development Co. Ltd.)

Keywords:Cu mineralization, Hydrothermal deposits, Potassic alteration

Concentration and deposition of Cu in hydrothermal deposits, which are the major source of Cu, have been discussed for a long time. Recent attempts to analyze metal concentrations in hydrothermal fluids in fluid inclusions by LA-ICPMS and to quantify the redox state of magmas by rare-earth compositions in zircon have revealed Cu concentration and precipitation mechanisms in magmatic hydrothermal systems.

To concentrate copper in the fluids that exsolved from a magma requires an oxidized condition for the parental magma that prevents sulfide precipitation from the magma directly. This oxidized magma may form along the magmatic zones where a sulfate-bearing oceanic plate subducts. Unless the magma assimilates reduced materials such as crustal sedimentary rocks, the magma fractionates and finally exsolves SO2- and Cu-enriched fluids.

To precipitate Cu sulfides from a hydrothermal fluid, either of the following processes is required: 1) decrease of temperature, 2) decrease of salinity, 3) increase of pH, or 4) increase of H2S concentration. In porphyry Cu systems, it has been argued that either of the temperature decrease, pH increase by the reaction that formed muscovite alteration, or increase of H2S by disproportionation of magmatic SO2 at <400C, is the major process for Cu mineralization. This study, however, found processes different from the previous ideas in the Grasberg (Indonesia) and El Salvador (Chile) porphyry Cu deposits and compared them with the process in the Arakawa hydrothermal vein deposit in Akita.

In the Grasberg deposit, the intrusive rocks responsible for Cu mineralization contain igneous anhydrite, which suggests that the original magma was highly oxidized (Fo2>FMQ+2). In the deposit, high-temperature hydrothermal fluids reacted with the host rocks, resulting in magnetite and subsequent anhydrite and sulfides precipitation. This occurrence indicates that the oxidation of ferrous iron in igneous minerals promoted the reduction of SO42- to H2S and Cu mineralization. At El Salvador, the reaction between Ca-bearing minerals (plagioclase, hornblende, titanite) in the host intrusive rocks and fluids promoted anhydrite and sulfide precipitation, which indicates disproportionation of gaseous SO2 in the fluids. These reactions at Grasberg and El Salvador occurred at 400-650C, following to the potassic alteration which includes abundant hydrothermal K-feldspar, biotite and magnetite. On the other hand, the fluid inclusion study of the Arakawa deposit indicates that the Cu mineralization was triggered by mixing of a relatively high-temperature (>300C) and high-salinity fluid and a low-temperature and low-salinity fluid.

The different Cu mineralization processes in hydrothermal systems are ascribed to a fluid pressure condition (lithostatic or hydrostatic) between the porphyry and epithermal systems, which may or may not form high temperature potassic alteration.