Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2019

Presentation information

[J] Poster

A (Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences ) » A-AS Atmospheric Sciences, Meteorology & Atmospheric Environment

[A-AS05] Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate

Wed. May 29, 2019 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Poster Hall (International Exhibition Hall8, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Yoshio Kawatani(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Shingo Watanabe(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Takashi Sekiya(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Kaoru Sato(Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

[AAS05-P12] Analysis of relatively low ozone in Arctic spring during the QBO-westerly and solar-minimum years

*Yousuke Yamashita1,2, Hideharu Akiyoshi2, Masaaki Takahashi2 (1.Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2.National Institute for Environmental Studies)

Keywords:stratospheric ozone, Northern Hemisphere polar vortex, chemistry climate mode

The equatorial quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and the 11-year solar cycle are known to cause year-to-year variability of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) polar vortex (e.g. Holton and Tan, 1980; Labitzke, 1987). Labitzke (1987) and several studies following her work have been used the four categories of the QBO and 11-year solar cycle, according to the westerly/easterly phase of the QBO (QBO-W/QBO-E) and the maximum/minimum phase of the 11-year solar cycle (Smax/ Smin). Camp and Tung (2007) suggested that the NH polar vortex is the most stable and the least perturbed state in late winter during the QBO-W/Smin years relative to the other three groups (QBO-W/Smax, QBO-E/Smax, and QBO-E/Smin), in agreement with the work of Labitzke and van Loon (1988). Their findings are in agreement with the smallest magnitude of the Arctic total ozone in QBO-W/Smin years among the four categories (Li and Tung 2014), because the ozone depletion is enhanced in the stable and cold polar vortex associated with an increase in chemical destruction through heterogeneous reactions on the Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs). Since the Arctic ozone amount is related to the ozone transport as well as the chemical ozone destruction, the estimation of their influences is still challenging issue for understanding the small amount of the Arctic total ozone in March.

In this study, we analyze the Arctic ozone amount using TOMS/OMI observations, ERA-interim reanalysis data, and the outputs of a chemistry climate model (CCM) with REF-C1SD hindcast simulation, in which the model’s zonal/meridional wind and temperature are nudged toward those of the ERA-interim reanalysis data with a 6-hour interval. The anomaly from the average for all the years of 1979–2011 in the Arctic total ozone amount is calculated for QBO-W/Smin group in late winter. We estimate the amounts of ozone transport and chemical ozone destruction and their effects on the derived Arctic ozone anomaly for the QBO-W/Smin group with CCM outputs.

Result of the composite mean for QBO-W/Smin years shows negative anomaly (relatively small amount) of total ozone in February–March compared to the 1979–2011 average from the CCM output, in agreement with the satellite observation, reanalysis data. To distinguish the effect of chemical ozone destruction from that of ozone transport for the total ozone anomaly in February–March, we analyze the total ozone anomaly of the passive ozone tracer without any chemical change in the CCM. The negative anomalies of the passive ozone tracer have a similar distribution to that of chemically reactive ozone with similar magnitude, suggesting that the negative anomalies of total ozone are mainly caused by ozone transport.

The outputs of CCM are also analyzed for vertical profile of ozone concentration, which indicates negative anomaly of the Arctic ozone in the upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere for the QBO-W/Smin condition, the maximum anomaly of ozone partial column is located around 50–70 hPa. The partial column of the passive ozone tracer at these levels also shows negative anomalies, whilst their magnitudes are small, especially at 50 hPa in March. These results suggest the significant influence of ozone transport on the negative ozone anomaly in February–March, whilst the influence of chemistry is partially large at 50 hPa in March.