[AOS19-P03] Relationship between solar wind and atmospheric circulation
Keywords:Solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling, High-speed solar wind, Internal gravity waves, Atmospheric circulation, Extratropical and tropical cyclones
More than four decades have passed since the discovery of a relationship between solar wind magnetic sector boundary structure and the winter mid-latitude upper-tropospheric vorticity/circulation [1,2]. These results have been later confirmed and various physical mechanisms proposed [3,4]. Solar wind to magnetosphere - ionosphere - atmosphere (MIA) coupling process generates internal atmospheric gravity waves propagating upward and downward from the lower thermosphere sources at high latitudes [5]. If ducted over long distances in the lower atmosphere they can reach troposphere [6,7]. Despite significantly reduced wave amplitude, but subject to amplification upon over-reflection in the upper troposphere, the gravity waves can trigger moist instabilities to initiate convective bursts [4]. The latent heat release is the source of energy leading to intensification of extratropical storms and convective bursts have been linked to rapid intensification of tropical cyclones. Recent studies [8,9,10] showed that explosive extratropical cyclones and rapid intensification of tropical cyclones tend to follow arrivals of solar wind high-speed streams and interplanetary coronal mass ejections. The solar wind MIA coupling is most intense during the arrivals of co-rotating interaction regions and interplanetary shocks at the leading edge of high-speed solar wind when the amplitudes of aurorally-generated gravity waves are largest. If these gravity waves trigger moist instabilities in extratropical and tropical cyclones to initiate convective bursts the intensification of cyclones leads to enhanced atmospheric circulation.
[1] Wilcox J. M., et al., Science, 180, 185-186, 1973.
[2] Wilcox J. M., et al., J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 581–588, 1974.
[3] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 27, 1–30, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1-2009
[4] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 27, 31–57, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-31-2009.
[5] Hines, C.O., Can. J. Phys. 38, 1441–1481, 1960.
[6] Mayr H.G., et al., J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10929–10959, 1984.
[7] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys., 23, 401-417, 2005. doi:10.5194/angeo-23-401-2005
[8] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 149, 219–231, 2016.
[9] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 171, 94–110, 2018.
[10] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 183, 36-60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.12.009.
[1] Wilcox J. M., et al., Science, 180, 185-186, 1973.
[2] Wilcox J. M., et al., J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 581–588, 1974.
[3] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 27, 1–30, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1-2009
[4] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys. 27, 31–57, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-31-2009.
[5] Hines, C.O., Can. J. Phys. 38, 1441–1481, 1960.
[6] Mayr H.G., et al., J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10929–10959, 1984.
[7] Prikryl P., et al., Ann. Geophys., 23, 401-417, 2005. doi:10.5194/angeo-23-401-2005
[8] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 149, 219–231, 2016.
[9] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 171, 94–110, 2018.
[10] Prikryl P., et al., J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 183, 36-60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.12.009.