Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2019

Presentation information

[J] Poster

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-GL Geology

[S-GL28] Regional geology and tectonics

Mon. May 27, 2019 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Poster Hall (International Exhibition Hall8, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Makoto Otsubo(Geological Survey of Japan, Research Institute of Earthquake and Volcano Geology), Jun Hosoi(Geological Survey of Japan, Institute of Geology and Geoinformation, AIST)

[SGL28-P04] Estimation of the paleostress directions using “new dyke method” from the microcracks in the Tanzawa Tonalite

*Misaki Tomioka1, Hideo Takagi1 (1.Waseda University)

The Tanzawa Tonalite intruded around 5-4 Ma (Tani et al. 2010) is located in the South Fossa Magna region that records the collision of Izu-Bonin Arc against the Honshu Arc. The paleostress direction has been estimated from the analysis of microcracks in quartz grains in the Tonalite (Sato and Takagi, 2010). Healed microcracks (HC) forming the plane of fluid inclusions are considered that they had formed just after the intrusion using fluid inclusion thermometry, and sealed microcracks (SC) had formed after HC formation by crosscutting relationship. The orientations of both HC and SC indicate that σHmax keeps around N-S~NNE-SSW direction. Recently, Yamaji et al. (2010), and Yamaji and Sato (2011) developed new method of grouping the orientations of dikes or veins (cracks) recording different stress field, and then to determine σ1, σ2, σ3 axes of each group and stress ratios by fitting mixed Bingham distribution (Bingham, 1974) (hereinafter called “new dyke method”). In this study, we estimated the paleostress using “new dyke method” for oriented samples used by Sato and Takagi (2010) to make it clear whether the σHmax is σ1 or σ2.
We measured strikes and dips of intracrystalline HC and SC using U-stage, and then analysed the distribution using “new dyke method” and the correction developed by Kanai et al. (2014) to determine σ1, σ2 and σ3.
As a result, the dominant stress directions for 16 points (HC) and for 22 points (SC) indicate that σ1 for HC and SC concentrates in vertical and NE-SW direction, respectively. With correcting 10° clockwise rotation by paleomagnetic research (Kanamaru and Takahashi, 2005), the paleostress orientation results should be vertical around 4Ma, and in NNE-SSW direction after 4Ma. Accordingly, the σHmax evaluated by HCs after Sato and Takagi (2010) is actually σ2, and this vertical stress seems to reflect the stress caused by the lifting in vertical direction along with subduction of Philippine Sea Plate placing the volcanic islands on it. On the other hand, the NNE-SSW direction of σ1 estimated by SCs can be explained by the collision of relatively large blocks that might be the Izu Peninsula collided around 1 Ma.

References:
Bingham, C., 1974, Annals of Statistics. 2, 6, 1201-1225.
Kanai, T., Yamaji, A. and Takagi, H., 2014, Jour. Geol., 120, 23-35.
Kanamaru, T., Takahashi, M., 2005, Jour. Geol., 111, 458-475.
Sato, T. and Takagi, H., 2010, Jour. Geol., 116, 309-320.
Tani, K, Dunkley, D. J, Kimura, J., Wysoczanski, R. J , Yamada, K. and Tatsumi, Y., 2010, Geology, 38, 215–218.
Yamaji, A., Sato, K. and Tonai, S., 2010, Jour. Struct. Geol., 32, 1137-1146.
Yamaji, A. and Sato, K., 2011, Jour. Struct. Geol., 33, 1148-1157.