日本地球惑星科学連合2019年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-PS 惑星科学

[P-PS08] 月の科学と探査

2019年5月30日(木) 09:00 〜 10:30 103 (1F)

コンビーナ:長岡 央(宇宙航空研究開発機構)、鹿山 雅裕(東北大学大学院理学研究科地学専攻)、西野 真木(宇宙航空研究開発機構宇宙科学研究所)、諸田 智克(名古屋大学大学院環境学研究科)、座長:田中 智西野 真木(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)

09:00 〜 09:15

[PPS08-01] Observing simulations of impact-induced moonquakes combined with the lunar impact flash observation data for future lunar seismic explorations

*小野寺 圭祐1,2川村 太一3田中 智2石原 吉明4前田 拓人5柳澤 正久6内田 有紀6阿部 新助7山田 竜平8岡本 尚也2 (1.総合研究大学院大学、2.JAXA宇宙科学研究所、3.パリ地球物理研究所、4.国立環境研究所、5.弘前大学、6.電気通信大学、7.日本大学、8.会津大学)

キーワード:月、月震、将来探査、衝突、月面衝突閃光

Over the past 50 years, the lunar interior has been investigated by analyzing the Apollo lunar seismic data (e.g. [1]-[3]). However, currently proposed models of the internal structure are not in accordance with each other although each model can explain the Apollo seismic data. This means there still exists a large uncertainty in the lunar internal structure because the Apollo data does not have enough quality to determine the inner structure precisely. Since the internal structure is a significant factor to elucidate the origin of the Moon, it is essential to obtain new seismic data in order to improve our knowledge of the lunar internal structure.

In particular, the lunar crustal structure (e.g. elastic velocity, density, layer-thickness) is significant when discussing the thermal environment at the initial stage of the lunar formation. From the observation results of KAGUYA (SELENE), it is suggested that the lunar crust consists of very pure anorthosite, which means the refractory element Al concentrates within the crust (e.g. [4][5]). Since the bulk amount of refractory elements gives a strong constraint on the thermal condition of the lunar formation, revealing the lunar crustal structure will lead to better understanding of the history of the Moon.

When determining the lunar crustal structure, impact-induced seismic waves are usually used [6]. Generally, at least 3 seismic stations are required to determine seismic source locations. In the case of the Apollo, although 4 seismic stations were placed and made a network on the nearside of the Moon, it was difficult to determine the impact locations (seismic source locations) precisely due to uncertain arrival time readings and unknown origin times. In future seismic explorations, it is required to carry out seismic observations even at a single point since it is difficult to deploy multi-seismic stations at once. In this situation, the precise determination of origin times and impact locations will play an important role in order to improve the crustal structure. However, as described above, it is considered that a single seismic station is not adequate for the precise determination of origin times and impact locations. This is one of the serious problems when performing a future seismic exploration.

In order to overcome this problem, it has been proposed to apply ground observation data of lunar impact flashes to seismic observations on the Moon [7][8]. Since the basic recording system of the impact flash observation allows us to determine impact times and locations more precisely compared to seismological approaches, it will enable to realize seismic observation at single point. However, these fields of study (lunar impact flash and lunar seismology) have been carried out independently in the past. In this study, we bring these two field together by performing observing simulations of impact-induced seismic waves by combining a seismological simulation with the lunar impact flash observation data as a first step for the consideration of a future seismic exploration.

In the presentation, we will report the simulation results of the lunar seismic observations and discuss the requirements for a future seismic instrument and landing site.


References
[1] Toksöz et al. (1974), Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 12, 539-567.
[2] Lognonné et al. (2003), Earth Plant. Sci. Lett., 211, 27 – 44.
[3] Garcia et al. (2011), Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,188, 96 – 113.
[4] Ohtake et al. (2009), nature, 461, 236-241.
[5] Yamamoto et al. (2012), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L13201.
[6] Chenet et al. (2006), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 243, 1-14.
[7] Tanaka et al. (2018), Proc.NVM2-Asia, #6025.
[8] Yamada et al. (2019), Proc.Lunar Planet. Science Conf., 50th, #1770.