日本地球惑星科学連合2019年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-IT 地球内部科学・地球惑星テクトニクス

[S-IT21] 核-マントルの相互作用と共進化

2019年5月28日(火) 10:45 〜 12:15 A10 (東京ベイ幕張ホール)

コンビーナ:河合 研志(東京大学大学院理学系研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、飯塚 毅(東京大学)、太田 健二(東京工業大学大学院理工学研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、土屋 卓久(愛媛大学地球深部ダイナミクス研究センター)、座長:辻野 典秀上木 賢太

11:45 〜 12:00

[SIT21-29] Dependence of the dipole component dominancy on the Rayleigh number and inner core size in geodynamo simulations

*西田 有輝1加藤 雄人1松井 宏晃2松島 政貴3熊本 篤志1 (1.東北大学大学院理学研究科地球物理学専攻、2.Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis、3.東京工業大学理学院地球惑星科学系)

キーワード:地球ダイナモ、内核サイズ、レイリー数、双極子成分

Geomagnetic field is generated by a dynamo action in the fluid outer core. Studies of the thermochemical evolutions of the Earth's core suggest that the solid inner core has been growing up for approximately one billion years [e.g., O'Rourke and Stevenson, 2016]. Results of numerical dynamo simulations with various aspect ratios (ratios of inner to outer core radii) indicates that the sustained magnetic field is categorized into dipolar-dominated or non-dipolar-dominated regime [e.g., Hori et al., 2010; Driscoll, 2016]. However, any dominant factors controlling the regime have not been fully understood. In the present study, we perform dynamo simulations with various inner core radii using a geodynamo code Calypso to investigate the characteristics of the generated magnetic field. We fix the Ekman, Prandtl, and magnetic Prandtl numbers to be E = 10-3, Pr = 1, and Pm = 5, respectively, and change the Rayleigh number and the aspect ratio to be ri/ro = 0.15, 0.25, and 0.35. Then we examine the dominancy of the dipole component in two approaches; one is calculating the dipolarity, fdip, which is the ratio of the amplitude of the axial dipole magnetic field to the total amplitude, and the other is comparing magnetic energy for the dipole component with extrapolated magnetic energy for l = 1 using an exponential function for odd degree components from l = 3 to l = 19. The magnetic energy for the dipole component is compared with that extrapolated from the fitting curve.

In ri/ro = 0.25 and 0.35 cases, fdip is approximately 0.8 at Ra/Racrit ≒ 2.0 and gradually decreases to approximately 0.45 with increase of Ra/Racrit up to around 6.0, where Racrit is the critical Rayleigh number. By referring to the obtained fitting curve, we find that the magnetic energy for the dipole component is more than 5 times larger than the extrapolated value for l = 1 at Ra/Racrit ≒ 2.0 and decreases with increase of Ra/Racrit in both aspect ratios. The dependency of the dipole component dominancy on the Rayleigh number is similar in both aspect ratio cases. However, in the ri/ro = 0.15 case, fdip is approximately 0.4 at Ra/Racrit ≒ 8.0 and decreases to approximately 0.1 with increase of Ra/Racrit up to around 15.6. At Ra/Racrit = 8.1 and 9.0, the amplitude of the dipole component is comparable to extrapolated value from the fitting curves. At Ra/Racrit > 10.1, the magnetic energy for l = 1 component is smaller than that for the l = 2 component. Consequently, the magnetic field obtained in the simulation results is non-dipolar. To summarize above, we categorize the present dynamo simulations as shown in Figure 1. Here we define strong/weak dipolar dynamo by a condition that the magnetic energy is larger/smaller than the kinetic energy. The axial dipolar component becomes small in all three ratio cases for larger Rayleigh numbers. Non-dipolar components become larger for the smaller inner core. In other words, for ri/ro < 0.35, it is likely that the dipolar magnetic field is dominant for larger inner core.