4:30 PM - 4:45 PM
[SSS12-11] Gravity survey at the extension of the Takahama fault and the Yokosuka fault in Nishio City, Aichi Prefecture
Keywords:active fault, gravity anomaly, subsurface structure, density structure, seismic reflection survey, Lacoste gravimeter
We conducted a gravity survey in Nishio city, Aichi Prefecture to clarify the subsurface structure related to the Takahama fault and the Yokosuka fault (Fig.1). Seismic reflection survey was held in that area in September 2018 (Ito, 2019) and the velocity structure was also obtained by refraction analysis. Then, we consider that we can clarify more detailed subsurface structure by conducting gravity survey on the seismic survey lines and their extensions (Line1 and Line2) and also by comparing gravity survey results with the seismic survey results. We also conducted gravity survey along the Yahagi Furukawa river (Line 3) that is supposed to cross the northern extension of the Yokosuka fault in the active fault map “Gamagori” (Okada et al., 2004) issued by Geospatial Information Authority of Japan and that is also crossing the concealed fault inferred by Sugito and Okada(2004).
In this survey, a total of 150 points of relative gravity was measured by the Lacoste D-type gravimeter (D68) and the Lacoste G-type gravimeter (G304). Measurement distance intervals were about 50m or 100m on Line1 and Line 2, about 30m or 50m on Line 3. The location coordinates of each gravity measurement point were mainly measured by GNSS(network type RTK-VRS), while some points were also measured by Total Station. Gravity anomaly was calculated by the standard procedure SPECG1988 (GSJ Gravity Survey Group, 1989). We performed terrain correction with 50m mesh DEM (Murata et al., 1996) for the Bouguer anomaly calculation. The contribution of terrain on gravity anomaly is small because the surveyed area is nearly flat. In fact, the maximum difference between simple Bouguer anomaly and the Bouguer anomaly calculated with 50m mesh DEM is 0.074mGal, and the pattern of the anomaly profile does not differ greatly between them.
As a result of gravity survey, the pattern of the Bouguer anomaly profile on Line1 and Line 2 is well related to the contour line of 3000m/s in P wave velocity section by the refraction analysis. On Line3, the Bouguer anomaly shows significant change around the point where the presence of the concealed fault of the Yokosuka fault was estimated (Sugito and Okada, 2004; Imaizumi et al., 2018). In addition, the Bouguer anomaly shows complex change on the eastern part of Line 2, where the P wave velocity is also lower than surrounding area by the result of the refraction analysis. In the coming months, we are going to make the density structure model by using the reflection boundary of the seismic profile and the gravity anomaly to reveal the details.
Reference
GSJ Gravity Survey Group (1989) On the standard procedure SPECG1988 for evaluating the correction of gravity at the Geological Survey of Japan. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan, vol.40(11), p.601-611
Ito, S., (2019), Subsurface Structure at the North of the Yokosuka Fault by Seismic Reflection Survey, this meeting
Imaizumi, T., Miyauchi, T., Tsutsumi, H., Nakata, T. (2018) Digital Active Fault Map of Japan [Revised Edition], 154p
Murata, Y., Makino, M., Endo, H., Watanabe, K., Watanabe, S., Urabe, A. (1996) Microgravity survey in Kobe, Ashiya and Nishinomiya cities, Kinki district, Japan(1)-Bouguer anomaly and concealed faults-. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan, vol.47(2/3), p.109-132
Okada, A., Suzuki, Y., Tsutsumi, H., Togo, M. (2004) 1:25,000 The active fault map “Gamagori”, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan
Sugito, N., Okada, A. (2004) Surface rupture associated with the 1945 Mikawa Earthquake, Active Fault Research, vol.24, p.103-127
In this survey, a total of 150 points of relative gravity was measured by the Lacoste D-type gravimeter (D68) and the Lacoste G-type gravimeter (G304). Measurement distance intervals were about 50m or 100m on Line1 and Line 2, about 30m or 50m on Line 3. The location coordinates of each gravity measurement point were mainly measured by GNSS(network type RTK-VRS), while some points were also measured by Total Station. Gravity anomaly was calculated by the standard procedure SPECG1988 (GSJ Gravity Survey Group, 1989). We performed terrain correction with 50m mesh DEM (Murata et al., 1996) for the Bouguer anomaly calculation. The contribution of terrain on gravity anomaly is small because the surveyed area is nearly flat. In fact, the maximum difference between simple Bouguer anomaly and the Bouguer anomaly calculated with 50m mesh DEM is 0.074mGal, and the pattern of the anomaly profile does not differ greatly between them.
As a result of gravity survey, the pattern of the Bouguer anomaly profile on Line1 and Line 2 is well related to the contour line of 3000m/s in P wave velocity section by the refraction analysis. On Line3, the Bouguer anomaly shows significant change around the point where the presence of the concealed fault of the Yokosuka fault was estimated (Sugito and Okada, 2004; Imaizumi et al., 2018). In addition, the Bouguer anomaly shows complex change on the eastern part of Line 2, where the P wave velocity is also lower than surrounding area by the result of the refraction analysis. In the coming months, we are going to make the density structure model by using the reflection boundary of the seismic profile and the gravity anomaly to reveal the details.
Reference
GSJ Gravity Survey Group (1989) On the standard procedure SPECG1988 for evaluating the correction of gravity at the Geological Survey of Japan. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan, vol.40(11), p.601-611
Ito, S., (2019), Subsurface Structure at the North of the Yokosuka Fault by Seismic Reflection Survey, this meeting
Imaizumi, T., Miyauchi, T., Tsutsumi, H., Nakata, T. (2018) Digital Active Fault Map of Japan [Revised Edition], 154p
Murata, Y., Makino, M., Endo, H., Watanabe, K., Watanabe, S., Urabe, A. (1996) Microgravity survey in Kobe, Ashiya and Nishinomiya cities, Kinki district, Japan(1)-Bouguer anomaly and concealed faults-. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan, vol.47(2/3), p.109-132
Okada, A., Suzuki, Y., Tsutsumi, H., Togo, M. (2004) 1:25,000 The active fault map “Gamagori”, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan
Sugito, N., Okada, A. (2004) Surface rupture associated with the 1945 Mikawa Earthquake, Active Fault Research, vol.24, p.103-127