JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

Presentation information

[J] Poster

A (Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences ) » A-CG Complex & General

[A-CG56] Coastal Ecosystems-2. Coral reefs, seagrass and macroalgal beds, and mangroves

convener:Yu Umezawa(Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology), Toshihiro Miyajima(Marine Biogeochemistry Group, Division of Ocean-Earth System Science, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo), Atsushi Watanabe(The ocean policy research institute, The Sasakawa peace foundation), Tomihiko Higuchi(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo)

[ACG56-P01] Nano-SIMS analysis can highlight the effect of symbiotic zooxanthellae on sulfur utilization of corals

*Tomihiko Higuchi1, Kentaro Tanaka1, Kotaro Shirai1, Ikuko Yuyama2, Takuma Mezaki3, Naoto Takahata1, Yuji Sano1 (1.Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 2.University of Tsukuba, 3.Kuroshio Biological Research Foundation)

Keywords:Coral, Symbiosis, Sulfur

Despite sulfur is the main component in the ocean as sulfate ions, little is known about utilization in living organisms. Genome analysis has revealed that corals, which are host animals, do not have a system for synthesizing cysteine, essential amino acid and one of the sulfur-containing amino acids (Shinzato et al. 2011, Nature). This suggests that corals may receive cysteine synthesized by zooxanthellae, or may obtain and use it heterotrophically. It has been confirmed that sulfur is concentrated in zooxanthellae by autoradiography using radioactive isotope 35S. In addition, the amount of 35S accumulated in the coral animal tissues, zooxanthellae, and skeletons was examined. As the exposure time to 35S in seawater increased, the amount of radioactive sulfur accumulated in coral tissues and zooxanthellae increased. (Yuyama et al. 2016, Biol Open). In this study, a stable isotope labeling experiment was conducted and analyzed by NanoSIMS (NS 50, Cameca) to clarify how sulfate ions in seawater are taken up by corals and zooxanthellae. In the experiment, a juvenile polyp of genus Acropora (approximately 1 month old) was used to create a zooxanthellae symbiotic polyp with infection of Durusdinium (Clade D) and an apo-symbiotic polyp without infection of zooxanthellae. Corals were incubated in filtered seawater with Na234SO4 (sulfur isotope ratio +1000 ‰) for 2 days. Individuals that had been isotopically labeled for two days were returned to normal seawater and incubated for two days. After incubation, juvenile corals were embedded with resin and cutting and polishing were conducted for NanoSIMS analysis. When the sulfur isotopes 32S and 34S were mapped using NanoSIMS, high 34S points were found in the coral soft tissue. This study reconfirmed that coral uptakes sulfur from seawater as sulfate ions. In particular, 34S-labeled sites were found in the presence of zooxanthellae and in coral animals close to seawater. In addition, the aposymbiotic polyps showed a 34S label in the host part, indicating that the host corals assimilate sulfate ions without passing through the symbiotic algae. Furthermore, even after returning to normal seawater for 2 days after the 34S label, the 34S label was clearly seen in both symbiotic and aposymbiotic polyps, indicating that assimilated sulfur was preserved for at least 2 days.