JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

Presentation information

[E] Poster

A (Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences ) » A-OS Ocean Sciences & Ocean Environment

[A-OS19] Marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles: theory, observation and modeling

convener:Takafumi Hirata(Arctic Research Center, Hokkaido University), Shin-ichi Ito(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo), Enrique N Curchitser(Rutgers University New Brunswick), Eileen E Hofmann(Old Dominion University)

[AOS19-P08] Comparison of spatiotemporal variety between in-situ and remote surface chlorophyll in the northern South China Sea

*Yun Hsuan Lu1, Ko Mei Lin1, Yung Yen Shin1 (1.Department of Applied Science, R.O.C Naval Academy)

Keywords:chlorophyll, satellite, northern South China Sea

The chlorophyll a (Chl) plays an important role as an indicator to assess phytoplankton biomass in the ocean. Many studies determine the amount of biomass and the level of primary production based on Chl concentrations. However, the difference between in-situ and remote Chl values may be influenced by specific factors of time and space. There will be cause an ambiguity in depicting of the marine biogeochemical cycle, if only a remote Chl is used to explore the marine biogeochemistry. Therefore, we conducted 10 cruise from February 2013 to November 2019 at the northern South China Sea (NSCS), collected and analyzed wide covers of surface Chl to assess diversities of in-situ and remote Chl. The measured/remote values of Chl in spring, summer, autumn and winter were 0.12±0.09/0.18±0.01, 0.22±0.02/0.14±0.24, 0.12±0.01/0.11±0.02 and 0.28±0.23/0.38±0.32 mg m-3. The measured surface Chl in summer and winter are higher than the seasons of spring and autumn; the remote Chl is higher in spring and winter than in the seasons of summer and autumn. We can infer that the prevalence of the northeast monsoon and extreme weather events (e.g. typhoons, internal waves) may be main reasons to cause the elevated Chl in winter and summer, respectively. It implies that the satellite data cannot fully reflect the real natures. The measured/remote values in the shelf, slope and basin were 0.26±0.18/0.22±0.08, 0.23±0.15/0.20±0.06 and 0.18±0.09/0.18±0.05 mg m-3. Although, the trend of Chl derived from field-measured and remote-sensed are quite similar, the difference of Chl from in-situ and remote in the region of shelf is more apparent than in other areas. It may result from the influence of topography. Our preliminary research shows that the spatiotemporal variety between in-situ and remote surface Chl is quite significant and the further utilization of remote Chl needs to be calibrated in the NSCS.