[MIS22-P02] No mechanism to expand Space! Big Bang hypothesis has 't been proven!
Red-shift can be explained by New stationary space theory based on Quantum Red-Shift. Neither black holes nor Dark matter are required. Validated by Abuduction
★Invited Papers
Keywords:A new evaluation method to elucidate the mystery of infinity, transcending space with abduction to verify the truth, A new evaluation method to elucidate the mystery of origin, transcending time with abduction to verify the truth, Big Bang hypothesis has 't been proven!, Red-shift has already been explained in New Stationary Cosmology with Quantum red-shift., Black holes and dark matter are also Hypotheses., Mechanism for Expanding Space has not been proven !
"Currently, various Cosmologies are proposed. Each of them has a Different Hypothesis, and None of them has been proved as one. Reason is that there is no correct Evaluation Method.
Mechanism to expand Space cannot be proved! Big bang is just an Astronomer's Hypothesis to explain Red-shift! As a Dogma. Reason why Universe cannot be collapsed is explained by adding an Inexplicable Hypothesis that Expanding energy and Attraction of Dark Matter are balanced. It is unknown who said it, and it is irresponsible. When Traffic Lght is red at Intersection, No one is afraid if everyone crosses Road together. Ignore those who complain that it's weird! Given Laws of conservation of energy, it is Authoritarian to devise Black Holes and Dark Matter and continue Dogma without evidence. Eiichiro Komatsu was able to observe Background Isotropic Radiation of Universe, and Profile was similar to that of Blackbody Radiation at 2.725K. He said in 2014 that Observations were evidence of a Big Bang. Reason why Universe does not collapse is explained by adding an Inexplicable Hypothesis that Expanding Energy and Attraction of Dark Matter are balanced.
However, Observed Background Radiation is described in “Unknown Encyclopedia (1) p91-p100. Rowan Robinson 1980-July” on p95 “Energy Density of this Back Ground Radiation comes from many Galaxies. It is very similar to Average Energy Density of Stars. There is No known way to transform Light of such a Star into a form of Black Body Radiation at 2.7 degrees K. " It has said. Yes, I have observed that Light from a Distance in Universe is "Diluted in Energy according to Lambert's law" and that Frequency shifts to Red. In other words, at Observation point, it can be explained theoretically as a Quantum Mechanical Effect. Furthermore, since Observation point is not at Center of Universe but at Earth, it can show Isotropicity.
[1] Redshift has already been explained in Abduction at Japan Society for Planetary Sciences, "P1-23 Spatial Quantum Redshift Hypothesis and New Stationary Cosmology".
[2] Background Radiation at 3 degrees K can be explained by Fact that Average Solar Frequency Distribution was observed at 3 degrees K, with Peak shifted by Radius of Closed Universe.
[3] Red-shift at Center of Earth is only when Observation Position is Earth.
[4] Reason that Universe cannot be collapsed is explained by Mach Dynamics in a finite Universe, which considers Action (Attraction) and Reaction (Inertial Mass) to be balanced.
Biggest Mystery of Big Bang Hypothesis is that Mechanism of Spatial Expansion has not been Physically Proven. Because Ruler expands with Space, it is impossible to explain Observation of Spatial Expansion. I can't prove it for anyone else, but No Spatial Expansion has been observed. Only way to evaluate Origin of Universe was to analyze and integrate Results, and to estimate them by Induction and Deduction. Now, if you evaluate "How many features of Universe can be explained" as a result of Evolution by abduction, Hypothesis can be easily broken. Black holes,
dark matter and the big bang are no longer needed. Atomic physicists and astronomers on the Big Bang are excellent freeriders. People who construct their own theory based on Big Bang, Black Hole and Dark Matter are free riders, so Grounds are broken. Do not accept Illusion of your predecessor. Search for Truth by myself.
Check Truth of Hypothesis in Current state of Nature.
Earth is also a part of Universe, not Center of Universe. Quantum mechanics has been demonstrated on Earth, and it is used industrially in ICs and LSIs. In quantum mechanics, energy is applied where it is diluted into space. Light arriving from beyond Universe is diluted in Space. In other words, if Energy conservation law and frequency conservation become impossible at the same time, Frequency shifts to Red.
This is Grounds of [1] red-shift.
Space does not need to expand. Before inflating with a big bang, if energy is concentrated on one point, it is a big black hole and cannot explode (laughs). How can we explain Contradiction in which Effect of Space Expansion can be observed with distant light when Space Expansion cannot be observed on Earth?
Origin of Universe.
Until now, Big Bang hypothesis was believed to be correct, even if it had not been substantiated because there was No Hypothesis to compare. Who can actually prove a Big Bang?
There is a theory in Christianity that "God created World".
A similar, Big-Bbang Hypothesis has now been denied. Like Reincarnation of Buddhism, it can be said that Universe has No beginning and is Changing Forever.
Space does not need to expand. How can we explain Contradiction in which Eeffect of space expansion can be observed with distant light when space expansion cannot be observed on Earth?
Mechanism to expand Space cannot be proved! Big bang is just an Astronomer's Hypothesis to explain Red-shift! As a Dogma. Reason why Universe cannot be collapsed is explained by adding an Inexplicable Hypothesis that Expanding energy and Attraction of Dark Matter are balanced. It is unknown who said it, and it is irresponsible. When Traffic Lght is red at Intersection, No one is afraid if everyone crosses Road together. Ignore those who complain that it's weird! Given Laws of conservation of energy, it is Authoritarian to devise Black Holes and Dark Matter and continue Dogma without evidence. Eiichiro Komatsu was able to observe Background Isotropic Radiation of Universe, and Profile was similar to that of Blackbody Radiation at 2.725K. He said in 2014 that Observations were evidence of a Big Bang. Reason why Universe does not collapse is explained by adding an Inexplicable Hypothesis that Expanding Energy and Attraction of Dark Matter are balanced.
However, Observed Background Radiation is described in “Unknown Encyclopedia (1) p91-p100. Rowan Robinson 1980-July” on p95 “Energy Density of this Back Ground Radiation comes from many Galaxies. It is very similar to Average Energy Density of Stars. There is No known way to transform Light of such a Star into a form of Black Body Radiation at 2.7 degrees K. " It has said. Yes, I have observed that Light from a Distance in Universe is "Diluted in Energy according to Lambert's law" and that Frequency shifts to Red. In other words, at Observation point, it can be explained theoretically as a Quantum Mechanical Effect. Furthermore, since Observation point is not at Center of Universe but at Earth, it can show Isotropicity.
[1] Redshift has already been explained in Abduction at Japan Society for Planetary Sciences, "P1-23 Spatial Quantum Redshift Hypothesis and New Stationary Cosmology".
[2] Background Radiation at 3 degrees K can be explained by Fact that Average Solar Frequency Distribution was observed at 3 degrees K, with Peak shifted by Radius of Closed Universe.
[3] Red-shift at Center of Earth is only when Observation Position is Earth.
[4] Reason that Universe cannot be collapsed is explained by Mach Dynamics in a finite Universe, which considers Action (Attraction) and Reaction (Inertial Mass) to be balanced.
Biggest Mystery of Big Bang Hypothesis is that Mechanism of Spatial Expansion has not been Physically Proven. Because Ruler expands with Space, it is impossible to explain Observation of Spatial Expansion. I can't prove it for anyone else, but No Spatial Expansion has been observed. Only way to evaluate Origin of Universe was to analyze and integrate Results, and to estimate them by Induction and Deduction. Now, if you evaluate "How many features of Universe can be explained" as a result of Evolution by abduction, Hypothesis can be easily broken. Black holes,
dark matter and the big bang are no longer needed. Atomic physicists and astronomers on the Big Bang are excellent freeriders. People who construct their own theory based on Big Bang, Black Hole and Dark Matter are free riders, so Grounds are broken. Do not accept Illusion of your predecessor. Search for Truth by myself.
Check Truth of Hypothesis in Current state of Nature.
Earth is also a part of Universe, not Center of Universe. Quantum mechanics has been demonstrated on Earth, and it is used industrially in ICs and LSIs. In quantum mechanics, energy is applied where it is diluted into space. Light arriving from beyond Universe is diluted in Space. In other words, if Energy conservation law and frequency conservation become impossible at the same time, Frequency shifts to Red.
This is Grounds of [1] red-shift.
Space does not need to expand. Before inflating with a big bang, if energy is concentrated on one point, it is a big black hole and cannot explode (laughs). How can we explain Contradiction in which Effect of Space Expansion can be observed with distant light when Space Expansion cannot be observed on Earth?
Origin of Universe.
Until now, Big Bang hypothesis was believed to be correct, even if it had not been substantiated because there was No Hypothesis to compare. Who can actually prove a Big Bang?
There is a theory in Christianity that "God created World".
A similar, Big-Bbang Hypothesis has now been denied. Like Reincarnation of Buddhism, it can be said that Universe has No beginning and is Changing Forever.
Space does not need to expand. How can we explain Contradiction in which Eeffect of space expansion can be observed with distant light when space expansion cannot be observed on Earth?