JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM18] 太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成

コンビーナ:山本 衛(京都大学生存圏研究所)、小川 泰信(国立極地研究所)、野澤 悟徳(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、吉川 顕正(九州大学大学院理学研究院地球惑星科学部門)

[PEM18-P11] Study of atmospheric stability in the polar upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere above Tromsø by using sodium LIDAR data

*前田 咲穂1野澤 悟徳1川原 琢也2斎藤 徳人3津田 卓雄4和田 智之3高橋 透5川端 哲也1ホール クリス6 (1.名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所、2.信州大学工学部、3.理学研究所光量子工学研究センター、4.電気通信大学、5.オスロ大学物理学科、6.ノルウェー北極大学)

We will report atmospheric stability in the polar upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere (MLT) region (80-105 km) above Tromsø, Norway (69.6°N, 19.2°E) based on 2500 hours of sodium LIDAR data.

We have analyzed temperature and velocity data (6 min and 0.5 km resolutions) obtained over 8 seasons from October 2012 to March 2019 (about 2500 hour measurements of 237 nights). We have evaluated both static (convective) instability and dynamic (shear) instability using the square of Brunt–Väisälä frequency (N2) and Richardson number (Ri), respectively. Furthermore, we have calculated the instability probability defined as the percentage of an occurrence rate of unstable regions over the time interval. The probabilities of static instability and dynamic instability are shown as P(N2 < 0) and P(0 < Ri < 1/4), respectively. The temperature data and wind data are used to calculate N and wind shear (dv/dz), respectively.

We have found that P(N2 < 0) varies from a maximum of 20.6 % to a minimum of 0.5 %, and P(0 < Ri < 1/4) varies from a maximum of 14 % to a minimum of 1.6% in the altitude region between 85 km to 95 km. P(N2 < 0) tends to be larger than P(0 < Ri < 1/4). These probabilities do not show any obvious monthly variations from October to March, rather day-to-day variabilities are prominent. As shown in Figure 1, over the entire period, P(N2 < 0) at around 90 km altitude tends to be lower than those at around 80 km and 100 km: the static instability was less likely to occur at around 90 km. There is a weak correlation between P(0 < Ri < 1/4) and the semidiurnal tidal amplitude, but no correlation between P(N2 < 0) and the semidiurnal tidal amplitude is found.

Based on these observational results, we will present the characteristics of the atmospheric stabilities in the polar winter MLT region above Tromsø. Furthermore, the results will be compared with those in mid-latitude.