JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

Presentation information

[E] Oral

P (Space and Planetary Sciences ) » P-PS Planetary Sciences

[P-PS04] Regolith Science

convener:Koji Wada(Planetary Exploration Research Center, Chiba Institute of Technology), Akiko Nakamura(Graduate School of Science, Kobe University), Patrick Michel(Universite Cote D Azur Observatoire De La Cote D Azur CNRS Laboratoire Lagrange), Kevin John Walsh(Southwest Research Institute Boulder)

[PPS04-03] The size of ejecta particles of the artificial impact crater formed by Hayabusa2 Small Carry-on Impactor

*Koji Wada1, Ko Ishibashi1, Hiroshi Kimura1, Masahiko Arakawa2, Hirotaka Sawada3, Kazunori Ogawa3,2, Kei Shirai2, Rie Honda4, Yuichi Iijima3, Toshihiko Kadono5, Naoya Sakatani3, Yuya Mimasu3, Tomoaki Toda3, Yuri Shimaki3, Satoru Nakazawa3, Hajime Hayakawa3, Takanao Saiki3, Yasuhiko Takagi6, Hiroshi Imamura3, Chisato Okamoto2, Masahiko Hayakawa3, Naru Hirata7, Hajime Yano3 (1.Planetary Exploration Research Center, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2.Kobe University, 3.JAXA, 4.Kochi University, 5.University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 6.Aichi Toho University, 7.The University of Aizu)

Keywords:Hayabusa2, Small Carry-on Impactor, Deployable Camera 3, Ryugu, Impact crater, ejecta

A projectile accelerated by Hayabusa2 Small Carry-on Impactor succeeded in producing an artificial impact crater with a diameter of >10 m on the surface of the asteroid Ryugu on April 5, 2019. At the time of cratering, Deployable Camera 3 (DCAM3) took clear images of ejecta curtain emerged from the crater. Comparing the ejecta curtain images to a theoretical model of ejecta curtain, we infer the size of the particles composing the ejecta curtain. Since almost of the ejecta particles come from the underground, we can discuss about the particle size distribution of the subsurface layer of Ryugu and the evolution process of Ryugu’s surface layer. As a result, the typical size range of the ejecta particles is estimated to be ~cm to several 10 cm, although it depends on the assumed size distribution. This typical size is relatviely small compared to the boulder size on the uppermost surface, suggesting some kind of surface process occured in the past.