JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-CG 固体地球科学複合領域・一般

[S-CG58] Science of slow earthquakes: Toward unified understandings of whole earthquake process

コンビーナ:井出 哲(東京大学大学院理学系研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、廣瀬 仁(神戸大学都市安全研究センター)、氏家 恒太郎(筑波大学生命環境系)、波多野 恭弘(大阪大学理学研究科)

[SCG58-P40] Spatial heterogeneity of shallow tremor activity near the Japan Trench

*大柳 修慧1太田 和晃2伊藤 喜宏3日野 亮太4太田 雄策4東 龍介4篠原 雅尚5望月 公廣5佐藤 利典6村井 芳夫7 (1.京都大学理学研究科、2.防災科学技術研究所、3.京都大学防災研究所、4.東北大学、5.東京大学地震研究所、6.千葉大学、7.北海道大学)

キーワード:低周波微動、日本海溝、アレイ解析、海底地震計

The Japan Trench subduction zone hosts various types of seismic activities, such as Mw 9.0 Tohoku Oki megathrust event, tectonic tremors, and VLFEs. Recent development of S-Net (cabled network of OBSs) and intense free-fall type OBS observations near the trench revealed very frequent activity of shallow tremor along the whole subduction margin [Nishikawa et al., 2019; Ohta et al., 2019; Tanaka et al., 2019]. The tremor identified in these studies have poor resolution in their depth, since they located the tremor with the envelope cross correlation method. From 2016 to 2017, we had deployed an array of 3 dense OBS arrays near the trench axis of offshore Fukushima region. Taking advantage of the array analysis, we have shown that the shallow tremor observed in the offshore Fukushima region is predominantly occurring at the plate interface [Ohyanagi et al., 2019 JpGU]. However, in this research, epicenter of the tremor is located solely based on arrival direction of tremor wave estimated at 3 arrays. Due to limitation of the method, tremor cannot be located in some area within the array of arrays network. Thus, distribution of tremor hypocenters has spatial gap which may caused by methodological issues.
Here, we updated hypocenters of ambient tremors and dynamically triggered tremors using the Multi Beam Back-Projection method [Ghosh et al., 2009; 2012] to verify if tremors are occurring at the spatial gap. Ghosh et al. (2009; 2012) does not evaluate uncertainty of located tremor explicitly. In our study, we evaluate uncertainty of located hypocenters following a method proposed in Arnadottir and Segall (1994).
Succeeded in locating the tremors, we estimated their energy rate. The site amplification factor of each OBS is corrected between 2Hz – 8Hz by the coda normalization method (e.g., Sato and Fehler, 1998). After the site amplification factor is corrected for each OBS, we evaluate seismic energy of the tremors at each array. At certain array, time delay is applied to waveforms of the tremors according to their slowness and arrival direction acquired through beamforming. The delayed traces are stacked to suppress ambient noise. The stacked traces at each array is then collected for geometrical spreading and intrinsic attenuation to estimate seismic energy at the source. At last, the estimated energy is divided by duration of the tremor to convert to the energy rate.
The updated location still shows spatial heterogeneity within a shallow tremorgenic region. The ambient tremor activity is more frequent in the up-dip part of the region, and less frequent in the down-dip part. Although spatial distribution of the energy rate of the tremors is more or less homogeneous within the whole region, some of the tremors occuring up-dip have about 2 order larger energy rate than others. The frequent and potential of high energy rate activity of the tremor in the up-dip part may be related to the crustal deformation observed near the trench axis in offshore Fukushima [Iinuma et al., 2016; Tomita et al., 2017].

Acknowledgements: This study is supported by JSPS KAKENHI (19H05596).