JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-CG 固体地球科学複合領域・一般

[S-CG63] 変動帯ダイナミクス

コンビーナ:深畑 幸俊(京都大学防災研究所)、Ray Y Chuang(國立台灣大學地理環境資源學系)、竹下 徹(北海道大学大学院理学院自然史科学専攻)、岩森 光(東京大学・地震研究所)

[SCG63-04] Characteristic of fault geometry of the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand inferred from high precision aftershock distribution

*河村 優太1松本 聡1岡田 知己2松野 弥愛2飯尾 能久3佐藤 将2Bannister Stephen4Ristau John4Savage Martha5Thurber Clifford6Sibson Richard7 (1.九州大学、2.東北大学、3.京都大学、4.GNS Science、5.Victoria University of Wellington、6.University of Wisconsin - Madison、7.University of Otago)

キーワード:ニュージーランドカイコウラ地震、高精度震源決定、余震分布、断層形状

On November 14, 2016, a large earthquake with Mw7.8 occurred in northeastern South Island, New Zealand. The earthquake showed a complex rupture process involving many faults. Based on geodetic and geologic observation, previous studies (e.g., Clark et al., 2017) pointed out that over 20 faults were ruptured by the main shock. Two previous studies have relocated aftershocks using double-difference techniques (Mouslopoulou et al., 2019; Lanza et al., 2019). However, the event distribution in these studies was not always sufficient to reveal the fine fault geometry due to the low station spacing above the focal area within 50 km. More precise fault geometries than the previous studies are required in order to examine the relationship between coseismic fault behaviour and the observed surface breaks. In this study, we used temporary seismic stations that were deployed close to the rupture area prior to the main shock occurrence. We applied the double-difference earthquake relocation algorithm (Waldhauser and Ellsworth, 2000) to the phase data including time-domain waveform cross-correlation (Poupinet et al., 1984).
We obtained the hypocenter distribution concentrating around the surface breaks, with a depth range from 5 km to 25 km. From the aftershock distribution, we identified 10 or more faults. The geometry of the fault planes is consistent with the focal mechanism of the relatively large events in each cluster. In particular, one of the faults in this study, which was located in the area of large coseismic slip, may correspond to the fault orientation of the main shock inferred from its CMT solution.